We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Gladstone Claim Form with a twist
Comments
-
What I meant is does the lease having no mention of a parking scheme secure a victory or could I still have an issue.
No one here is in a position to definitively second guess a Judge. It ain't that straightforward - for you, or UKCPM.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Yes, that's what I thought you meant.
The problem is that if this ever gets to court you will need to convince a judge on that point. If you cannot manage to do that it is probably a good idea to have a few other arguments available.
Like perhaps poor signs, worn out bay markings, are the signs forbidding, etc.
In my opinion you would be unwise to rely on just that one point unless you can definitely show a judge that there is no way he can reject your argument.0 -
I actually was never sent a permit by CPM this is how it all started.What I meant is does the lease having no mention of a parking scheme secure a victory or could I still have an issue.
Did they say why there was no permit. For example were all the bays allocated to other tenants by a lease.
If you were parking on the common area there would be a defence but it depends on where you were parked and what implied rights you had. No mention means no explicit rights but you'd have an implied right in common with the other residents to the communal areas IF they were a common area.
UKCPM don't check this so you will need to - and you may have been told by your landlord.
Also were UKCPM there prior to you becoming a tenant or did the arrive afterwards.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
My tenancy which I have managed to lose since the last case says you must only park on a designated area so as designated by the landlord. (I have scanned pages used in the last case)
We have designated bays, I assume I was in my own bay when I had the ticket but it was so long ago I can't remember the PCN.
When I moved in there was no parking scheme, euro car parks then started to manage the car park and I had a permit, I have scanned documents of appeals being declined by CPM re the original case which clearly show close ups of my vehicle with a permit in the window from said company, UKCPM did not send me one when taking over. I may have not had any permit on display when the PCN in question was issued, hopefully my SAR will help with that and I get to see the images.
I have a tenancy with Hyde and I believe the owner may be Ringleys will this affect my defence of my tenancy lease, I had this in my defence last time:
Any consideration flows from the landholder, in this case my landlord, who is the leaseholder. I put the Claimant to strict proof of contractual authority from the landowner, on original documents containing their name and address, and written in their own words.
Thanks0 -
As regards the space, you will need to confirm it is actually the one designated to you.
As regards the introduction AFTER the AST was signed, then read Pace v Noor as it applies to your situation. The general rule is that terms in an AST can't be changed unless there is something in the AST to allow it. You say there isn't.
So it will all come down to whether you were in your own space or someone else's.
As regards the contract, you won't get it until the last minute but UKCPM do not check whether they can ticket you. They rely on their client indemnifying them so if you are being ticketed in your own space to which you have rights, you could mount a claim against the Agent - though few would have the nerve to do so.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
It definitely won't be someone else's bay, a very small chance of it being a communal area.
I can't believe they can still operate like this after so many year's
Thanks for your help, I have Friday off and will get my defence sorted.0 -
I can't believe they can still operate like this after so many year's
so write an email to your MP and complain, and ask them to contact Sir Greg Knight and to support his bill too
https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/parkingcodeofpractice.html
and watch the 2 videos from this year in the house of commons and the committee rooms , one last feb and one last july , its enlightening0 -
I've just found general form of judgement order from my last case with ukcpm in which they were ordered to pay me £97 as the claim was dismissed for non attendance by Dec 2015 which did not happen, I sent a copy via email to one of their employees on Jan 5th to prompt payment.
Could this be used in some way to discredit them in my defence.
Thanks0 -
Was it for the same event or a different one? If it was for the same event, then it could be awkward for them.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
no this current one is for a PCN issued March 2016 ( allegedly )0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards