We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Landlord didn't protect the deposit. Given notice, where do we stand.
Comments
-
Do landlords in Kent have to be registered? I see a few councils have accredited landlord schemes but there isn't mandatory licensing like there is in Scotland.
Has your friend actually moved out of the property yet? If not your friend simply has to stay put and refuse to move out until the full deposit is returned because I assume that your friend never agreed to any of these deductions.
The lack of deposit protection means that any Section 21 notice issued will be invalid unless the landlord returns either the full deposit or the deposit minus any deductions your friend has agreed to.
https://markprichard.co.uk/content/documents/180408-Section-21-checker-tool.pdf
If the deposit has not been protected then your friend can sue the landlord and must be awarded not less than one times the value of the deposit and not more than three times the value of the deposit by the court.
See G_M's Deposits: payment, protection and return.
My friend hasn't moved out of the property yet but is due to sign next week. She does not want to lose this new house as they have already paid a lot in fees and houses where we are get snapped up quickly. So she is in a bit of a catch 22 situation. The LL promised the full deposit back before moving so she could move quickly and not hamper the sale of the property. So my friend has managed to get another property based on these figures. She does not have spare money to take the LL to court as she already has 2 jobs and doesn't have any disposable income. But this means she can't now move forward! If she stays put she loses the new house and all the money paid so far for fees and referencing etc, she can't afford to throw this money away. No she did not agree to deductions. The house was inspected a few months before the LL said they wanted to sell so there shouldn't be any deductions as nothing was flagged at that time. The offer to return the full deposit happened after the house inspection.
Sadly there is no spare money to sue and this won't help in the short term as the new house won't wait.Neurodiverse and struggling with not being 'normal'.0 -
norainbows wrote: »My friend hasn't moved out of the property yet but is due to sign next week. She does not want to lose this new house as they have already paid a lot in fees and houses where we are get snapped up quickly. So she is in a bit of a catch 22 situation. The LL promised the full deposit back before moving so she could move quickly and not hamper the sale of the property. So my friend has managed to get another property based on these figures. She does not have spare money to take the LL to court as she already has 2 jobs and doesn't have any disposable income. But this means she can't now move forward! If she stays put she loses the new house and all the money paid so far for fees and referencing etc, she can't afford to throw this money away. No she did not agree to deductions. The house was inspected a few months before the LL said they wanted to sell so there shouldn't be any deductions as nothing was flagged at that time. The offer to return the full deposit happened after the house inspection.
Sadly there is no spare money to sue and this won't help in the short term as the new house won't wait.
Your friend has a choice to make:
a) Stay in the present house, which gives her leverage to get the rest of the deposit back, but lose the money already paid on the new place.
b) Move to the new place. She can then, at her leisure, sue the LL for failing to secure the deposit.
Personally, I'd choose b. The cost of suing the LL is rather small - just the court fees - and it's not that daunting.
Whether the LL declares the rent for tax is a complete red herring, unless you are planning to blackmail him/her. Either report the LL to HMRC, or don't. But you can get into serious trouble if you attempt to extort money from the LL on that basis.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
norainbows wrote: »My friend hasn't moved out of the property yet but is due to sign next week. She does not want to lose this new house as they have already paid a lot in fees and houses where we are get snapped up quickly. So she is in a bit of a catch 22 situation. The LL promised the full deposit back before moving so she could move quickly and not hamper the sale of the property. So my friend has managed to get another property based on these figures. She does not have spare money to take the LL to court as she already has 2 jobs and doesn't have any disposable income. But this means she can't now move forward! If she stays put she loses the new house and all the money paid so far for fees and referencing etc, she can't afford to throw this money away. No she did not agree to deductions. The house was inspected a few months before the LL said they wanted to sell so there shouldn't be any deductions as nothing was flagged at that time. The offer to return the full deposit happened after the house inspection.
Sadly there is no spare money to sue and this won't help in the short term as the new house won't wait.
Your friend isn't in a catch 22 situation at all. She is in a very strong negotiating position. Your friend doesn't have to sue the landlord she just needs to let him know that she knows she could.
You wanted to know where your friend stands and I've told you. It's up to her to decide how to use this knowledge. You say she's in a catch 22 situation but she is not. She is in a very strong negotiating position. Your friend doesn't even have to sue the landlord she just needs to let him know that she knows she could.0 -
Your friend isn't in a catch 22 situation at all. She is in a very strong negotiating position. Your friend doesn't have to sue the landlord she just needs to let him know that she knows she could.
You wanted to know where your friend stands and I've told you. It's up to her to decide how to use this knowledge. You say she's in a catch 22 situation but she is not. She is in a very strong negotiating position. Your friend doesn't even have to sue the landlord she just needs to let him know that she knows she could.
So important you said it twice
0 -
If the relationship is 'amicable', why not explain, amicably, that she cannot move (& afford new deposit) unless the current LL returns the full deposit in advance.
If LL refuses (ie 'amicability' disappears) then tenant advises LL that
1) she won't (can't) move till a court order is obtained by LL
2) S21 is invalid so LL can't get court order AND
3) she'll be claiming the penalty for non-protectuon of the deposit.
Chances are the LL will then 'amicably' return the full deposit to help the tenant move and hope the tenant leaves and does not sue for the penalty (which she can do any time in the next 6 years)
Has she had this conversation (recommended 3 days ago) yet ... ?0 -
norainbows wrote: »Why would the law abiding tenant be required to pay tax to the HMRC? She has been paying market value for the rent which is quite high and going up astronomically every few months?
The Landlord lives in the next road to the tenant.
If the LL lives overseas the tenant is required to deduct tax from the rent paid and pay that tax over to HMRC.
Clearly that won't apply here now that you have told us the LL is UK resident.0 -
If there is a small shortfall pending the return of the rest of the deposit then maybe take out a small loan or borrow from a friend rather than give up the new place?0
-
How can you be 100% sure that she is not declaring the rental income? The LL is hardly going to go around broadcasting that?
That is a huge deductive leap to make!norainbows wrote: »Because anytime a workman has gone to the house, through general conversation it transpired they thought they were relatives of the Landlord not private tenants, which is odd.
And anyway as pointed out, LL's tax position is really not relevant here.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards