We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Advance line rental refund.

JohnB47
JohnB47 Posts: 2,733 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
I've just read a Guardian online article and in the comments section there is someone complaining that if you pay for line rental up front but want to move away early, you don't get a refund of the unused line rental.

Fair enough, I think but then a 'contributor' replies as follows:

"You are mistaken; you do not need a refund. Line rental is independent of who you pay, and your rental of the line (which is actually from BT Openreach in most cases - third party suppliers simply collect the money for them and take a small cut) remains valid until your term expires. When you speak to a new provider, they will look up the line rental expiry date, and only charge you for the next year at the expiry of this year's rental."

I never knew that and actually I've never been in a position to make use of it.

Is this common knowledge then?

Comments

  • JJ_Egan
    JJ_Egan Posts: 20,281 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Not common knowledge as its 100% wrong .
    You pay line rental to your ISP not Openreach .
    ALR is lost unless you are cancelling under Ofcom rules due to a price increase in contract .
  • iniltous
    iniltous Posts: 3,920 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 5 August 2018 at 3:58PM
    JohnB47 wrote: »
    I've just read a Guardian online article and in the comments section there is someone complaining that if you pay for line rental up front but want to move away early, you don't get a refund of the unused line rental.

    Fair enough, I think but then a 'contributor' replies as follows:

    "You are mistaken; you do not need a refund. Line rental is independent of who you pay, and your rental of the line (which is actually from BT Openreach in most cases - third party suppliers simply collect the money for them and take a small cut) remains valid until your term expires. When you speak to a new provider, they will look up the line rental expiry date, and only charge you for the next year at the expiry of this year's rental."

    I never knew that and actually I've never been in a position to make use of it.

    Is this common knowledge then?

    If you quit a provider but have paid for 12 month line rental in advance, you get a pro rata refund,even if the customer service rep says its non refundable
    OR wholesale line rental is around £8 a month ( what OR get ) retail line rental is £18-£19 a month so it's hardly a small cut the retail provider gets , they arguably make more out if line rental than OR do..the Guardian article is probably poorly informed rubbish, and the contribution from a reader is absolute nonsense
  • JJ_Egan
    JJ_Egan Posts: 20,281 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My latest line rental circa £19 pm but BB fibre 1 discounted to £3 pm.Really proves the point .
  • boatman
    boatman Posts: 4,702 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    iniltous wrote: »
    If you quit a provider but have paid for 12 month line rental in advance, you get a pro rata refund,even if the customer service rep says its non refundable
    You won't get a refund if you just decide to leave for no reason, or there is a price rise built in to the contract, RPI for example.
  • JohnB47
    JohnB47 Posts: 2,733 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks everyone. What you are all saying sounds correct to me.

    The post I mentioned was not an ordinary one - from someone not connected to the paper that is. It was marked with a little G (for Guardian) and labelled 'Contributor'. It was as if it was a Guardian employee posting and it therefore seemed to imply a high degree of accuracy.

    Obviously not.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.