We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Unserved County Court Judgement - what can I do?
Options

ken_1969
Posts: 49 Forumite
I recently won a county court judgement (CCJ) against a private individual requiring a full refund plus court costs and interest.
However, I just got a letter from MCOL (Money Claims On Line) stating that the judgement has been returned "unserved". The message from MCOL said if I know of any change of address I should inform them, but it seems to me highly unlikely this person has moved.
Does anyone know exactly what this means? Is it simply the case that when a CCJ is delivered it needs to be signed for and the defendant was not at home (or deliberately not answering the door?).
Does anyone know what is the process when a CCJ is issued?
Initially the defendant had instructed a lawyer to act on their behalf, and when my original claim was issued this too was returned as undelivered - however, a copy had been delivered to her solicitor and so the document was successfully served. I believe once she realised I wasn't going to back down she dropped her representation so I don't think a copy was sent to them. Does the law firm have any obligation to inform the court if they are aware of a change of address / circumstances of their client?
I know that in practise CCJs can be hard to enforce and in the end it's maybe not the end of the world as for me it was as much about the principle as the money - but it's still well over £1,000 that I'm owned so it would be nice to get it back.
Anyone had something like this and able to offer any advice?
Many thanks in advance!
Ken
However, I just got a letter from MCOL (Money Claims On Line) stating that the judgement has been returned "unserved". The message from MCOL said if I know of any change of address I should inform them, but it seems to me highly unlikely this person has moved.
Does anyone know exactly what this means? Is it simply the case that when a CCJ is delivered it needs to be signed for and the defendant was not at home (or deliberately not answering the door?).
Does anyone know what is the process when a CCJ is issued?
Initially the defendant had instructed a lawyer to act on their behalf, and when my original claim was issued this too was returned as undelivered - however, a copy had been delivered to her solicitor and so the document was successfully served. I believe once she realised I wasn't going to back down she dropped her representation so I don't think a copy was sent to them. Does the law firm have any obligation to inform the court if they are aware of a change of address / circumstances of their client?
I know that in practise CCJs can be hard to enforce and in the end it's maybe not the end of the world as for me it was as much about the principle as the money - but it's still well over £1,000 that I'm owned so it would be nice to get it back.
Anyone had something like this and able to offer any advice?
Many thanks in advance!
Ken
£25,040 of credit card debt cleared!
Debt free as of July 2013! Now working through my mortgage!
Debt free as of July 2013! Now working through my mortgage!
0
Comments
-
If you want to play hardball you could use a Process Server to shove the papers in his hand.0
-
Isn't a solicitor's first duty to the court and not their client?0
-
Does the law firm have any obligation to inform the court if they are aware of a change of address / circumstances of their client?Anyone had something like this and able to offer any advice
If you have an address for the Defendant the best method is usually to instruct HCEOs (though there are other options too).0 -
One thing I'd add is to ask if the defendant or their solicitor ever told you that they were authorised to receive service on their behalf. If not then the service would be ineffective.
It may depend on exactly what was said. There was a case not too long ago where the defendants solicitor had asked for all correspondence to be sent to them but had not explicitly stated that they were authorised to receive service. The defendant was able to appeal on that basis.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards