We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Unilever shares: moving headquarters to Rotterdam

13»

Comments

  • Apodemus
    Apodemus Posts: 3,410 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    My documents from Unilever arrived yesterday, with the voting forms for the Court and EGM meetings.

    I’m fairly relaxed about the changes and trust the Board to take decisions that are in the long-term interests of the company and the shareholders. Even if I wasn’t, I’m not sure that the views of individual small-scale shareholders would ever add up to sufficient voting clout to sway the outcome!
  • Apodemus wrote: »
    Even if I wasn’t, I’m not sure that the views of individual small-scale shareholders would ever add up to sufficient voting clout to sway the outcome!
    I live in Parliamentary constituency where they only need to weigh the voting papers to see who has won, the incumbent has held the seat for over 30 years. I still vote though.
    For Unilever they need to get a 75% vote so it is not impossible it won't go the way the board want.
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,561 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    For Unilever they need to get a 75% vote so it is not impossible it won't go the way the board want.

    ..and with the latest news they have dropped the plan it's a time to be proud of our UK institutional shareholders for acting in the national interest.

    Alex
  • I think institutional investors were going to vote in their own interests rather than the national interest! It was effectively a takeover by the Dutch company of the British one. Usually with a takeover you receive a price for your shares above the market price. Many institutional shareholders would be forced sellers if they were only permitted to hold FTSE100 stocks. So a lose-lose situation. The share price seems to still be depressed despite the news. Might be a buying opportunity.
  • dividendhero
    dividendhero Posts: 2,417 Forumite
    Alexland wrote: »
    ..and with the latest news they have dropped the plan it's a time to be proud of our UK institutional shareholders for acting in the national interest.

    Alex

    Institutional investors have absolutely no requirement to act in the national interest, nor should they - would you be happy if your pension was devalued due to someone else's perception of the national interest?

    In this case institutions didn't want to be forced sellers of Unilever. I suspect this is only delaying of the inevitable - I have friends working at Unilever(UK), they say the direction of travel in the company is to reduce it's UK presence
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.