We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Dog bite 2 excesses? Advice please

Hi sadly my dog bit someone and they are putting in a claim.

Dog has been put down.

I have rang pet insurer morethan and they have asked for details of my contents insurance provider.

Both insurerance policies have 3rd party liability and morethan are suggesting a joint claim with my home insurance provider.

This will result in me having to pay 2 excesses for one claim which seems unfair as had I not bothered taking out pet insurance I would have been better off.

Is there anyway I can avoid both excesses ideally I don’t want to claim on my contents at all.

Thanks
«1

Comments

  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    Are you sure you have to pay two excesses?


    Normally the advice is to claim off the policy with the smallest excess and let the insurers sort it out
  • The lady I spoke to asked for details and said it could result in me paying both excesses i!!!8217;m not sure where I legally stand do I have to give details?
  • Not sure if they trying it on?
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    Yes you do need to give details of your other policy.


    But do claim off the one with the cheapest excess!
  • It sounds from conversation as if I have no say has to who I claim from. Pet excess £250 and contents £200 was leaning towards pet insurance as it!!!8217;s now cancelled and don!!!8217;t want to increase home contents premiums in future.
  • paddyandstumpy
    paddyandstumpy Posts: 1,486 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Under your home insurance, would a Liability claim still attract an excess? I appreciate all policies are different but when I did Home insurance our product wouldn't apply an excess to PL claims.

    Also, if you claim under your home insurance the claim will be disclosable for the next 5 years.

    If you claim under the pet insurance, given the pet has now been put down (sorry for your loss) I presume cover is no longer required, so personally I'd claim on this policy which will be cancelled anyway.

    If the pet insurer then chooses to seek a contribution from your HH insurer that is up to them, my point is if you don't make a claim under your HH insurance there isn't anything to declare (IMO).
  • Makes sense thanks and yes cover no longer needed, I will provide pet insurer with details and leave them to sort it out.
  • Zorillo
    Zorillo Posts: 774 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    A liability claim will be disclosable whichever policy you claim under, assuming an insurers questioning requires it to be.

    Usually you'd pay half of your excess to both insurers in a situation where both were dealing with a claim, but I can see no reason why both would need to deal with this one. The pet insurer could attempt to subrogate against the household insurer, that is up to them.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,094 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The lady I spoke to asked for details and said it could result in me paying both excesses


    Well she said "could" and presumably she doesn't work for both insurers.
    You might not have to pay an excess under the household policy.
    Note there might be different excesses/none for different sections of the household policy.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,936 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Bloomin heck, when I was a kid a Yorkshire terrier ran up and bit my leg through trousers, I had a tetanus jab and moved on with life...

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.