We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

HELP - Is my partner scr*wing me out of money??

124

Comments

  • Fed-up with people trying to find excuses to get other peoples money:cool::(
  • CocoLouie
    CocoLouie Posts: 78 Forumite
    If I was your ex I would feel like I was the one being scr*wed. Unless you are talking large sums of money that you input into the renovations then you most likely got to live there cheaply especially since you are being offered half of the savings back.


    Legally you may be able to get more although legal costs and since your ex paid the mortgage and more in bills than you they will likely fight it. Legally getting what you think you may be owed would be expensive so unless it is a large sum of money its probably best left. Morally on the other hand it doesn't look good....
  • westernpromise
    westernpromise Posts: 4,833 Forumite
    If the ex felt she "got to live there cheaply" then what he should have done was organise a tenants in common arrangement whereby he explicitly owns more than half the house.

    He didn't, so as I said above, the fairest arrangement is to split the equity the same way the costs of occupation were split.
  • I suspect you may not want to hear this - but...

    You should have agreed finances clearly before purchasing the property with him.

    Can I ask, what are the values? How much has been used of the savings and how much has the property value increase by?

    I suspect that on a £240k property is unlikely to be *millions* and therefore we are talking small sums.

    If your ex has offered to return the savings you have put in - then the biggest loss you are likely to suffer is the difference between the increased equity and the savings refund. What is this number?

    Is it enough to argue about? Enough to engage solicitors to recover?

    Forget the £40k, I suspect it will be difficult to prove it was a joint gift to you both. (Parents will claim it was a gift to their son, or loan to their son.)

    The lesson is to make sure you have finances documented for all eventualities before making future big purchases - and to be thankful for the 2.5 year you were free of rent and a landlord!

    Just my penny's worth!
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    I suspect you may not want to hear this - but...

    You should have agreed finances clearly before purchasing the property with him.

    Can I ask, what are the values? How much has been used of the savings and how much has the property value increase by?

    I suspect that on a £240k property is unlikely to be *millions* and therefore we are talking small sums.

    If your ex has offered to return the savings you have put in - then the biggest loss you are likely to suffer is the difference between the increased equity and the savings refund. What is this number?

    Is it enough to argue about? Enough to engage solicitors to recover?

    Forget the £40k, I suspect it will be difficult to prove it was a joint gift to you both. (Parents will claim it was a gift to their son, or loan to their son.)

    The lesson is to make sure you have finances documented for all eventualities before making future big purchases - and to be thankful for the 2.5 year you were free of rent and a landlord!

    Just my penny's worth!

    The OP doesn't have to prove that the £40k was a gift to both of them because she jointly owns the property with him and there is no DoT. He always had more to lose so it was in his interests rather than the OP's to have agreed the finances at the beginning.

    I'm not suggesting that the OP should take half the equity just that she could take half the equity. Once the ex realises this he should bite the OP's hand off for the terms she is proposing.
  • Pixie5740 wrote: »
    The OP doesn't have to prove that the £40k was a gift to both of them because she jointly owns the property with him and there is no DoT. He always had more to lose so it was in his interests rather than the OP's to have agreed the finances at the beginning.

    I'm not suggesting that the OP should take half the equity just that she could take half the equity. Once the ex realises this he should bite the OP's hand off for the terms she is proposing.

    Luckily, I don't think the OP is pathetic enough to pursue any of the 40K.

    Some on here are though
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Luckily, I don't think the OP is pathetic enough to pursue any of the 40K.

    Some on here are though

    Some on here what?
  • So, let's just clarify.

    - his parents paid the deposit
    - you never paid a penny of the mortgage
    - you each made a 50/50 contribution to renovation costs
    - he paid £180 CT, you paid £140 bills. So proportionally he paid more of the livings costs

    So (probably) you're entitled to 50% of the increase in the value between purchase price and the point you left the property. However, given he and his family subsidised your living costs i'd offer you the money you put in and no more.

    Sounds like he dodged a bullet!
  • westernpromise
    westernpromise Posts: 4,833 Forumite
    If he paid 80% of the costs of ownership he should get 80% of the equity.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.