We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Help!! Landlord Estate Agents Commission fees
Comments
-
Perhaps terminate the tenancy, then go onto rolling would do it? Or a new tenancy with (slightly) different terms?
It would be good to know if there are any other clauses that relate to this. I'm not so sure that the OP wouldn't be liable even with a new agreement due to ...for the entire period during which a Tenant remains in occupation of the Property including an initial term or any extension or renewal of each Tenancy
I would view it that the use of the word 'including' doesn't mean that it is restricted to those 3, and that if the tenant is still in the property then the money is owed to the LA.
Now if it has said 'during' rather than 'including', it could be argued that a new agreement would absolve the OP.0 -
Does this sound right to anyone?
Yes. For the simple reason that everybody would use agents to find suitable tenants then sack them at the first available opportunity. The fact that your tenants have stayed may in part be down to the professional nature of your agents in vetting prospective tenants.0 -
Hi thanks every one for your input.
The tenants have stayed because they love the house and the schools around the area are good. We as landlords have been pretty decent and been very responsive to emergencies, repairs etc. nothing to do with the Letting agents, they have done zilch. We finished our agreed contract of 3 years and we want out, surely we should have the flexibility to end the contract if we so wish.0 -
I suggest joining a Landlords Association and obtaining specific professional advice.They are an EYESORES!!!!0
-
The Commission is calculated as a percentage of the rent for the entire period during which a Tenant remains in occupation of the Property including an initial term or any extension or renewal of each Tenancy.
Perhaps you could argue that doesn't apply if you let them go onto a rolling tenancy, as that is not an initial term, extension, or renewal.0 -
The Commission is calculated as a percentage of the rent for the entire period during which a Tenant remains in occupation of the Property including an initial term or any extension or renewal of each Tenancy.Perhaps you could argue that doesn't apply if you let them go onto a rolling tenancy, as that is not an initial term, extension, or renewal.
Unfortunately for the OP, that would be a flawed argument as the clause only says "including" those things which means other situations (such as a rolling tenancy) would also trigger commission being due.
However the High Court has already ruled that such clauses are unfair and thus unenforceable where the agent "plays no part in persuading the tenant to stay, and does not collect the rent or manage the property."
Foxton's use of unfair terms
Of course, only the OP here has seen the full contract they signed but nevertheless I would point the agent in the direction of the ruling and advise them that you will not be paying any further commission but if they believe the High Court ruling does not apply to them then please advise why...Every generation blames the one before...
Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards