We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Legal liability vs tenant's liability
Comments
-
No, I just feel that it should be more precise. If it says "damages to property" are covered, it seems logical to me that it would cover "all damages to property."
But I probably just don't understand how the system works here.
Damages to property that are contents.
All damages to property would include a car, or an Airbus A321. You would need to pay a bigger insurance premium.0 -
Damages to property that are contents.
All damages to property would include a car, or an Airbus A321. You would need to pay a bigger insurance premium.
So how can I get a liability insurance for the rest? I have always heard that the only way to get legal liability cover in the UK is to purchase it as part of a contents insurance.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards