We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
POPLA appeal specific example request
Comments
-
You rubbish the scammers own signs to prove that "their" signage is inaccurate and can't form a contract. That's one appeal point.
You use other evidence to prove the car was not in the car park at all. That's a separate appeal point.
Not the landowner, is another point, as is, no standing to issue charges in their own name, as is non-POFA compliant NTK.
Us EVERY point that is relevant.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.
All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks0 -
I would say you use the signs in the car park you parked in.elephantsrus wrote: »KeithP - thanks, I'll make those changes.
Regarding using examples of the signs from the car park - the problem I've got is I don't know whether to use the signs from the car park the vehicle was parked in, or the signs from the car park CEL claim the vehicle was parked in, as they're completely different. Or perhaps use both? Or it doesn't matter which is used?
Even better if they identify the car park, and therefore show PoPLA that the PPC have screwed up again.0 -
Obviously don't say 'the car park I parked in'! Unless you already blabbed?elephantsrus wrote: »Civil Enforcement
CEL are easy to beat; how come they didn't fold at first appeal, did you not come here in time and use the template from the NEWBIES thread? Usually none go this far.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Coupon-mad - the vehicle was parked. No implication as to who parked it.
Unfortunately I found this forum too late for the first appeal.
Anyway, I've updated the document linked to from earlier to include the photos in point 5 as suggested. I've also fleshed out the text a bit for point 2 - would appreciate thoughts on that.
I'll give it some time in case there are any more suggestions and plan to upload the PDF at the end of the day.
Cheers guys!0 -
We assume you've appealed to POPLA now?
Keith P said 'looks good' so that a decent vote of confidence. Do you still need others to look, or is it in now?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Yep, I've submitted the appeal now thanks.
Will keep you posted on the outcome.0 -
Thanks again for all the help - I received a letter from CEL today saying they've cancelled the charge.0
-
Well done!0
-
Also got an email from PoPLA: "Civil Enforcement have told us they do not wish to contest the Appeal."
Very satisfying :-)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards