We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Defence to CEL

Hi,

In my earlier thread I asked about my defence letter to the court that I had received for a PCN at my works carpark. I did the acknowledgement online, so i believe i am up to the stage of submitting my defence. When i am using MCOL, it is telling me that my defence is above the line limit. Do i leave the defence open ended and then take the rest with me when i get a court date? Or should i edit it so that it fits into the 122 line limit?

Thanks

Comments

  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    nope, none of the above


    if your defence is finished , you save it , print it , sign and date it , scan back to pc and save as a pdf


    then you email it as an attachment to the CCBCAQ justice email address and add the mcol ref and name in the title and again in the email body plus name and address and any other relevant info etc
  • Jamesand
    Jamesand Posts: 20 Forumite
    Redx wrote: »
    nope, none of the above


    if your defence is finished , you save it , print it , sign and date it , scan back to pc and save as a pdf


    then you email it as an attachment to the CCBCAQ justice email address and add the mcol ref and name in the title and again in the email body plus name and address and any other relevant info etc

    Ok, thanks, thats brilliant. Am i best off attaching copies of my wage slip to this too, to prove that i work at the superstore? Thanks
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    no , because the evidence stage comes much later and you are emailing a government office, not a court


    the only thing going to Northampton is the actual DEFENCE, nothing else


    you dont appear to have read the posts by BARGEPOLE or LOC123 in post #2 of the newbies faq sticky thread if you are asking about what comes when and why, please read them
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    This is an entirely unregulated industry which is scamming the public with inflated claims for minor breaches of contracts for alleged parking offences, aided and abetted by a handful of low-rent solicitors.

    Parking Eye, CPM, Smart, and another company have already been named and shamed, as has Gladstones Solicitors, and BW Legal, (these two law firms take hundreds of these cases to court each year). They lose most of them, and have been reported to the regulatory authority by an M.P. for unprofessional conduct

    Hospital car parks and residential complex tickets have been especially mentioned.

    The problem has become so rampant that MPs have agreed to enact a Bill to regulate these scammers. Watch the video of the Second Reading in the HofC recently.

    http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/2f0384f2-eba5-4fff-ab07-cf24b6a22918?in=12:49:41

    and complain in the most robust terms to your MP. With a fair wind they will be out of business by Christmas.
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Jamesand, please stop creating new threads.

    We now have three threads covering this one incident and you may well find that people simple won't search looking for background information.

    This in turn will mean you could be given wrong advice.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.