Pet Insurance Claim Declined - Help!

So, our dog needed a specialist operation to remove a lump which was restricting her movement. I thought we'd be covered by pet insurance, up to £2000.
The final bill came to £5100!!
We cashed in some savings, thought we'd at least get some money back. But no!
The insurance company have declined the claim on the grounds that it was a pre-existing condition. She had a different smaller lump checked by the vet 2 years previously, but it was just a fatty lump and nothing to worry about, (said the vet). That lumps is still there.

The removed lump has never been noted on the vets system.
We are of course going to battle this one out, but wondered if anyone out there had any advice as to particular wording we should use, or indeed have any tips or recomendations. I genuinely didn't think that fatty lumps were a notifable health condition. More fool me. Advice please.....

Comments

  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 21,677 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    The exclusion of pre existing conditions is normally pretty wide and would apply to anything that previously occurred or anything that can be linked to it.

    A second lump would be considered the same condition as the first as it is the same clinical symptoms with the same diagnosis.

    Read your policy document ( not the policy summary) to see exactly what your policy says about pre existing conditions.
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 21,677 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    Anything that you consult your vet about, whether any treatment is given or not, is considered a pre existing condition.
  • w06
    w06 Posts: 917 Forumite
    Do you know what the lump that was removed was? Was that also a fatty lump (lipoma)? If it was then I agree it was a pre-existent condition, but if it was something else then that's not the same condition and I'd challenge the exclusion.

    I succesfully challenged one of my dogs' policy, years ago, trying to exclude his GI condition because of an apparent pre-existent condition that was totally different
  • iolanthe07
    iolanthe07 Posts: 5,493 Forumite
    This is the sort of story that convinces me that pet insurance is a waste of money. Insurance companies will use every twist and turn that they can to get out of paying. Much better to set up your own fund and. unless you are really unlucky, you will end up with a nice savings account. I put £5K aside and add to it at £50 a month for my puppy.
    I used to think that good grammar is important, but now I know that good wine is importanter.
  • I agree with Sheramber, anything consulted and discussed with the vet will be classed as 'pre-existing.'


    I do see and understand why people would rather not have insurance and just put the money aside every month.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.