We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

A lesson in being a sole freeholder and living on site.

2 years ago we bought the freehold to our block of 4 flats. None of the other leaseholders were interested in buying the freehold (short sighted as all but our leases are below 70 years now).

We didn't want the freehold to be sold on the open market and be at the whim of an external freeholder charging what ever they wanted for service charges etc.....

Well it's hard work. We have a management company doing the day to day running but it does not stop the other leaseholders hassling us when we are home.

One example is they want the front garden completely hard surface so parking would be easier for all. 2 of the 3 leaseholders have been moaning about it for months. So we get 3 quotes for the work. It averaged at about 16k so £4k per flat. We write to them all with the quotes and say we will issue section 20 consultations if they want us to go ahead. Then all hell breaks loose with them saying how unfair it is that they have to pay that much money out for car parking etc...... They can't afford that amount of money and they want to leave it.

They moan at every bit of maintenance that has to be done to the block. We had a blocked drain recently that meant raw sewage was pouring into the road. They moaned how they would have to pay for it. They are moaning about having the gutters cleared and cleaned and how that is costing them service charges.

One has moaned that they have a "structural issue" in their flat with cracking on a wall. A surveyor has been out and it's cosmetic cracking. They are expecting that the money to fix the cracking to come out of the service charge from all the flats sigh.

I can understand why people sell off a freehold when you have to live on site and it not being a shared freehold. It makes it very draining.

We now have a robotic stance of "you need to contact the management company" and refuse to get drawn in to any conversation about the block and maintenance etc.... it is draining though living through it all.

Just a word of warning to anyone considering what we have done.
«13

Comments

  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,569 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 14 June 2018 at 10:30AM
    divadee wrote: »
    One example is they want the front garden completely hard surface so parking would be easier for all. 2 of the 3 leaseholders have been moaning about it for months. So we get 3 quotes for the work. It averaged at about 16k so £4k per flat. We write to them all with the quotes and say we will issue section 20 consultations if they want us to go ahead.

    I know this isn't the purpose of your post, but...

    It sounds like you're saying there was no hard-standing previously (i.e. when the lease was granted).

    If so, you can't do a s20 for that - it's an improvement. You can't force leaseholders to pay for improvements, only for maintenance and repairs (unless you have very unusual leases).

    If all the leaseholders want hard-standing, they can volunteer to give you £4k each for you to arrange it. But if any of them refuse to give you £4k, you cannot force them.
  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,082 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    eddddy wrote: »
    I know this isn't the purpose of your post, but...

    It sounds like you're saying there was no hard-standing previously (i.e. when the lease was granted).

    If so, you can't do a s20 for that - it's an improvement. You can't force leaseholders to pay for improvements, only for maintenance and repairs (unless you have very unusual leases).

    If all the leaseholders want hard-standing, they can volunteer to give you £4k each for you to arrange it. But if any of them refuse to give you £4k, you cannot force them.

    Fair enough, but it was the leaseholders that wanted it done. The problem they appear to have is paying for anything.
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,569 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Doozergirl wrote: »
    Fair enough, but it was the leaseholders that wanted it done. The problem they appear to have is paying for anything.

    ... yes - although the OP is also complaining about the hassles of being a freeholder, whilst planning to do completely unnecessary admin work.

    The OP could lighten their burden by just saying to each leaseholder "Here's a copy of a quote from Mr A Builder for £16k. Have a chat amongst yourselves, and if you're happy, transfer £4k each into my account and I'll tell them to get started."
  • tacpot12
    tacpot12 Posts: 9,527 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    £4K is a lot of money for some people. The other leaseholders probably didn't realise it would be quite that much.

    Having taken on this role, you are going to have this hassle for quite a while. Your best hope is to keep reminding the other leaseholders that you are trying to keep the costs down, but that you also have a duty to ensure that the work is done properly. I do agree that buying the freehold was a very good option for you, even though it has come with these problems.

    I think this is a good post in that it warns others of the unintended consequences of one leaseholder buying the freehold. The relationships between the flat owners has become unbalanced, with one owner holding a lot of power. Anyone with the opportunity to do this should think about whether setting up a management company with every flat owning a share might be a safer option if the personal relationships are precious to them.
    The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.
  • All this Freehold / Leasehold stress


    All properties should be commonhold
  • divadee
    divadee Posts: 10,608 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    eddddy wrote: »
    I know this isn't the purpose of your post, but...

    It sounds like you're saying there was no hard-standing previously (i.e. when the lease was granted).

    If so, you can't do a s20 for that - it's an improvement. You can't force leaseholders to pay for improvements, only for maintenance and repairs (unless you have very unusual leases).

    If all the leaseholders want hard-standing, they can volunteer to give you £4k each for you to arrange it. But if any of them refuse to give you £4k, you cannot force them.

    No there is hard standing. We have an in and out drive. They all wanted 4 parking spaces face on facing the property. In the leases it states parking is first come first served (only 3 cars can fit on without having to ask someone to move).

    We have no problem with how it is now. If the 3 spaces are full (very rarely) then we park on the road.

    It is just stressful when neighbours are knocking on your door at all times of the day or night asking for these things but don't actually have the funds to pay for anything.
  • divadee
    divadee Posts: 10,608 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    tacpot12 wrote: »
    £4K is a lot of money for some people. The other leaseholders probably didn't realise it would be quite that much.

    Having taken on this role, you are going to have this hassle for quite a while. Your best hope is to keep reminding the other leaseholders that you are trying to keep the costs down, but that you also have a duty to ensure that the work is done properly. I do agree that buying the freehold was a very good option for you, even though it has come with these problems.

    I think this is a good post in that it warns others of the unintended consequences of one leaseholder buying the freehold. The relationships between the flat owners has become unbalanced, with one owner holding a lot of power. Anyone with the opportunity to do this should think about whether setting up a management company with every flat owning a share might be a safer option if the personal relationships are precious to them.

    We felt we had to buy the freehold to protect ourselves. We couldn't afford massive hikes in service charges.

    I did just want to warn others that it can be very draining when we just want a quiet life. I don't care really about the neighbours other than to get on as neighbourly as possible. We all have to live close to each other so being polite is the easiest way. I'm sure if the freeholder didn't live on site none of the leaseholders would kick up the fuss as much as they do. It just feels as we are here they can ask us at any time they want.
  • teneighty
    teneighty Posts: 1,347 Forumite
    In my experience leaseholders never want to pay for repairs unless it benefits their own flat and even then they usually moan about the cost.

    Self managed blocks where leaseholders have a share of freehold are even worse as they usually cannot reach a consensus so put off doing essential maintenance or do the most basic cheapest short term patch repairs.
  • divadee wrote: »
    It is just stressful when neighbours are knocking on your door at all times of the day or night asking for these things but don't actually have the funds to pay for anything.

    Hold an AGM with the leaseholders where the service charge is discussed and plan for the year - agree for the year what you all want to happen, if they come knocking out side of that time (unless its an emergency) stock reply - "Please add it to the list of things to discuss at the AGM"
  • D_M_E
    D_M_E Posts: 3,008 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Another problem I see looming is what are you going to do when one of them wants to sell and wants to extend their sub-70 year lease?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.