Car allowance paid by employer

Car_54

facade wrote: »

But if the car is used exclusively for work purposes, then there ought to be a better way to finance it, as he really shouldn't have to pay tax on a "benefit in kind", as he hasn't got one.

To be "used exclusively for work purposes" he would need to keep the car at the office and commute by other means. I suspect he doesn't do that.


Benefit in kind isn't relevant: he's getting cash, not a car.

foxy-stoat

facade wrote: »

But if the car is used exclusively for work purposes, then there ought to be a better way to finance it, as he really shouldn't have to pay tax on a "benefit in kind", as he hasn't got one.

There will be a better way to get to work - not lease a new car but buy an older/cheaper one but that wouldnt be an option until the lease ends.

arcon5

BoGoF wrote: »

What do you mean one or the other?

As in either claim the expenses incurred or claim mileage relief but not both at once