PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Anti Money Laundering Problems

Options
124

Comments

  • westernpromise
    westernpromise Posts: 4,833 Forumite
    Mela322 wrote: »
    HSBC and even after they were convicted of allowing it to happen, they still continued to find ways to allow it to continue to go on. I'm pretty sure there was another big bank that allowed money laundering but HSBC is the one that sticks in my mind.

    The other you are thinking of was probably Deutsche Bank:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-28/how-mirror-trades-moved-billions-from-russia-quicktake-q-a

    Mostly, though, when banks get fined in this area, they don't get fined for money laundering because they haven't done any. Instead they get fined for not having adequate controls against it in the opinion of their regulator, who is never actually able to say what adequate controls would look like.
    https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-bnp-paribas-moneylaundering-idUKKBN18T2JE
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Mela322 wrote: »
    He was doing really well and then our bank (business account as a limited/registered company) froze the account.

    Always worth checking ones responsibilities as a Director before embarking on such a venture. The banks reaction is what you would expect in such circumstances.
  • westernpromise
    westernpromise Posts: 4,833 Forumite
    Did you even read what he said he did, he didn't simply invest 375k into bitcoin.

    You look like a 1st class bitter and spiteful idiot with comments like this. And I'm pretty sure you are one . . .

    Go and re-read post #3. He bought his bitcoins in August last year. At that time bitcoin was worth about half what it is now. So to have £500k or £750k or any other sum now from having sold Bitcoin, he must have put in half that amount in August last year.

    Who except a very high net worth sophisticated investor or a money launderer would risk that sort of money on a single bet? Who would be more likely to foresee problems buying anything with that money? Where did the original sum come from?

    His solicitor's suspicions are not misplaced.
  • westernpromise
    westernpromise Posts: 4,833 Forumite
    Custard81 wrote: »
    Salty much? How do you know im not a multi-millionaire and what business of yours is this anyway? If you really want to know, i didnnt invest 750k into bitcoin but if you'd bothered reading my posts youd know this already. :eek:

    I didn't say you did. You said you bought in August last year. Last year bitcoin was worth about half what it is now, so to have £750k now, you must have bought about half that amount then.

    The question is then not merely why you would do that but where the original sum deposited came from.

    Your spelling comprehension, naivety around what is involved in depositing large amounts of unexplained money into banks, and lack of access to expert advice argue strongly against your being a multi-millionaire.
  • LittleFawn
    LittleFawn Posts: 22 Forumite
    Third Anniversary
    Unfortunately you will have to show them all of your information.
    I am going through a similar argument with my solicitor at the moment over £4k.
    Yes £4k.
    I had that amount saved for my job and it’s what I opened my savings account with about a year ago. So they asked me for bank statements from the past 6 months.
    Provided them the bank statements then told me that it’s not sufficient becuase it doesn’t showing me transacting the £4k or acruing it.
    I’m like funnily enough I have a job? And I’ve been working in my job for years? Haha they are being so strict it’s frustrating.
  • John_Jones
    John_Jones Posts: 208 Forumite
    Mela322 wrote: »
    HSBC and even after they were convicted of allowing it to happen, they still continued to find ways to allow it to continue to go on. I'm pretty sure there was another big bank that allowed money laundering but HSBC is the one that sticks in my mind.
    That is called moving the goalposts. They were not fined for money laundering, they were fined because although they had strong checks in place to stop people laundering via their accounts they were found to be not strong enough.
  • John_Jones
    John_Jones Posts: 208 Forumite
    Custard81 wrote: »
    I bought Bitcoin in August and invested shortly after into an ICO through a syndicate (using Etherium). I had the ICO tokens distributed a few months after that i sold back into Bitcoin and then into cash through a broker.

    The paper trail isnt that straight forward and what Im finding so far is that the very mention of Bitcoin is putting solicitors off from the bat.

    The second option above would be far more convenient if it would be acceptable.
    It is worth reminding you of this post. What you mention here is identical to the layering phase of money laundering.

    You are hinting that you are very well off so just buy the house with a small mortgage or selling some more mainstream investments bought from salary, and then use the bitcoin for living expenses.
  • takman
    takman Posts: 3,876 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Go and re-read post #3. He bought his bitcoins in August last year. At that time bitcoin was worth about half what it is now. So to have £500k or £750k or any other sum now from having sold Bitcoin, he must have put in half that amount in August last year.

    If your not used to the terminology and don't know much about cryptocurrency then it's easy to misunderstand; post 3 does not say he bought Bitcoin then simply kept it and sold it now.

    He bought Bitcoin then changed it into another established cryptocurrency which he then used to purchase a brand new coin just being released (an ICO) then he sold these coins back into Bitcoin and then changed them to cash. Brand new coins can increase very rapidly in value just after release, so the original amount invested will be nowhere near half what he has now if he sold at the right time.
  • deFoix
    deFoix Posts: 213 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Custard81 wrote: »

    The paper trail isnt that straight forward and what Im finding so far is that the very mention of Bitcoin is putting solicitors off from the bat.


    Try harder. You should be able to put together the full paper trail using printouts of your various exchange accounts etc. Im sure if its genuine you'll be able to get it signed off. Do you have a the paper trail?

    This is no difference really to proving any other investment gains.
  • westernpromise
    westernpromise Posts: 4,833 Forumite
    takman wrote: »
    If your not used to the terminology and don't know much about cryptocurrency then it's easy to misunderstand; post 3 does not say he bought Bitcoin then simply kept it and sold it now.

    He bought Bitcoin then changed it into another established cryptocurrency which he then used to purchase a brand new coin just being released (an ICO) then he sold these coins back into Bitcoin and then changed them to cash. Brand new coins can increase very rapidly in value just after release, so the original amount invested will be nowhere near half what he has now if he sold at the right time.

    Exactly how a money launderer would try to obfuscate the trail of where the money came from.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.