We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Claim for PCN from Jan 2010
Comments
-
Do you know who's car park the original parking ticket was issued in?
I would be tempted to look at putting a counter claim/claim against them over the actions of their agents in pursuing this, after is been statute bared.
their agents, the parking company had no just cause to keep, and more importantly process your data to your detriment after such a long time (6+ year's) has passed.From the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"0 -
I just dont understand why the systems dont throw this out - oh wait, governemnt IT...0
-
That would require an assessment of the merits of all claim forms presented to the court. There is no resource to do this. Everything is issued.I thought the law was as simple as , after 6 yrs a county court claim could not be started , even in cases of confirmed debts , unlike this case a speculative invoice ?
Further there can be practical realities why parties may agree to extend limitation dates. So, in essence, limitation is only a problem for them once pleaded as a defence and it's why it MUST be pleaded in applicable cases.
If memory serves the o/p told them that they were out of time, so assuming all dates stack up correctly and there is no basis to extend limitation, there's option to run a gdpr claim, I think and seek 27(1)(g) costs - if it can be established this is vexatious litigation and misuse of personal data.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards