We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Claim for PCN from Jan 2010

2»

Comments

  • Half_way
    Half_way Posts: 7,658 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Do you know who's car park the original parking ticket was issued in?
    I would be tempted to look at putting a counter claim/claim against them over the actions of their agents in pursuing this, after is been statute bared.
    their agents, the parking company had no just cause to keep, and more importantly process your data to your detriment after such a long time (6+ year's) has passed.
    From the Plain Language Commission:

    "The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"
  • nosferatu1001
    nosferatu1001 Posts: 12,961 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    I just dont understand why the systems dont throw this out - oh wait, governemnt IT...
  • I thought the law was as simple as , after 6 yrs a county court claim could not be started , even in cases of confirmed debts , unlike this case a speculative invoice ?
    That would require an assessment of the merits of all claim forms presented to the court. There is no resource to do this. Everything is issued.

    Further there can be practical realities why parties may agree to extend limitation dates. So, in essence, limitation is only a problem for them once pleaded as a defence and it's why it MUST be pleaded in applicable cases.

    If memory serves the o/p told them that they were out of time, so assuming all dates stack up correctly and there is no basis to extend limitation, there's option to run a gdpr claim, I think and seek 27(1)(g) costs - if it can be established this is vexatious litigation and misuse of personal data.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.