PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Estate Agent Advice

2»

Comments

  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    mije1983 wrote: »
    It's not designed to be used to get out of legally binding contracts. Can you imagine the free for all that would result if it did.


    'I've racked up a massive debt but I require company x to delete all data they hold about me'!


    The data collected by the EA is still required as per the terms of the OPs contract with them, and can be proven that it is still required. If the EA erases all data, how they can enforce the term that the OP readily agreed to at the outset?

    You’re missing the point.
    It’s a threat. Get my details offline as I am objectionable **** who will keep hassling you and wasting more and more of your time until you do so.

    Even if the EA is more than confident in their right to leave adverts in place, do they really want the hassle of dealing with a regulatory complaint?
    I doubt it.
  • mije1983
    mije1983 Posts: 3,665 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Name Dropper
    mrginge wrote: »
    You’re missing the point.
    It’s a threat. Get my details offline as I am objectionable **** who will keep hassling you and wasting more and more of your time until you do so.

    Even if the EA is more than confident in their right to leave adverts in place, do they really want the hassle of dealing with a regulatory complaint?
    I doubt it.




    I highly doubt empty threats will make any EA let go of any money that could be legally theirs in the future, especially as now they have a 6 month window when they could get paid for doing nothing. And no doubt the EA will see right through the OP as being incorrect, just like when you hear people in shops shouting 'I know my rights', and you can hear they clearly don't! I would say it is more likely that it is going to make them even more determined to get every penny they can from the OP.




    Having re-read your post, the mention of adverts and details being taken offline, it appears you believe the adverts are still in place on RM? The OP confirmed some posts ago that it is no longer the case.
  • mrginge
    mrginge Posts: 4,843 Forumite
    mije1983 wrote: »
    Having re-read your post, the mention of adverts and details being taken offline, it appears you believe the adverts are still in place on RM? The OP confirmed some posts ago that it is no longer the case.

    Ah yes, misread OP.
    Ignore all previous.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    When changing from Agent 1 to Agent 2 it would have been sensible to furnish Agent 2 with a list of those introduced by Agent 1 and agreement reached that if an Agent 1 introduction went on to purchase, only Agent 1 would be remunerated.

    If you did not do this, you may be liable for the fees of both agents.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • Marvel1
    Marvel1 Posts: 7,447 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mrginge wrote: »
    You’re missing the point.
    It’s a threat. Get my details offline as I am objectionable **** who will keep hassling you and wasting more and more of your time until you do so.

    Even if the EA is more than confident in their right to leave adverts in place, do they really want the hassle of dealing with a regulatory complaint?
    I doubt it.

    I'm confused about this new act as it is, thought it was right what you advised and now it's a lie! :mad:
  • greatgimpo
    greatgimpo Posts: 1,256 Forumite
    You coud have told both estate agents to split the commission or everybody loses. There's nothing to stop you all agreeing to sign a new contract outlining that proposal and dumping the first contract. Don't treat them as gods.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.