We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
A
samlee0211
Posts: 35 Forumite
Aaaaaaaaaaa
A
A
0
Comments
-
Just my opinion but i don't think that additional distance would be reasonable therefore it's not a 'suitable' alternative, leaving redundancy the only valid option. However you might end up having to go to a tribunal to prove it.The questions that get the best answers are the questions that give most detail....0
-
As I understand, it's assessed based on additional time / cost rather than distance itself. I'm assuming both are also impacted so it shouldn't be an issue as its not a "suitable alternative"
Our office only moved about 10 miles across london, but the additional time & cost to some was big (logistically due to moving from an office with parking to one without - along with tube connections etc.) so the company paid both a reducing travel cost adjustment to all, plus offer of redundancy to any journeys increased by more than 30 minutes each way (if i remember correctly).Peter
Debt free - finally finished paying off £20k + Interest.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards