We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Historic PPI claim Nat West
Last month i thought id try again using there online PPi webpage to ask if i had any historic loan accounts that had PPI. The only information i had was a bank account and a sort code.
They replied last week with a letter stating 5 accountcard numbers(only the last 4 digits of each) with my bank sort code all had PPI. All had there start dates and close dates, dated between 1992 and 1998 and each one had the amount of insurance premium paid. They enclosed a claim form and return envelope.
I have now completed an online claim for each of these PPIs on nat wests webpage
Comments
-
Er good?
Do you need any help with your complaint (not claim) or were you just letting us know?Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
No dont need help just a heads up for all the people that think they cant claim historical PPIs. Which is the general advise that people get given0
-
centurion_36 wrote: »No dont need help just a heads up for all the people that think they cant claim historical PPIs. Which is the general advise that people get given
Err, no it isn't.
The general advise here in MSEland is that there is no historical time limit as such. It is however the case that the longer you go back in time the more likely it is that no records exist.
(Besides, aren't almost all PPI complaints historical.):)0 -
centurion_36 wrote: »No dont need help just a heads up for all the people that think they cant claim historical PPIs. Which is the general advise that people get given
Err, who is giving that advice? This site, PPI claim firms etc all tell you that you can go back as far as you have records for and can prove miss-saleSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards