We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

large ppi claim

Hi Does anyone know what the largest PPI payout has been? Tried a calculation tool and it projects a six figure sum. £9980 paid in PPI from 1987-2009. Self employed so not valid. Worried we will be conned.
«1

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    It will be whatever it is. 6 figures is not out of the question, but it doesn't matter what the largest redress has ever been.

    However, most PPI did cover the self employed.

    Do you or your lender still have full records for that period?
  • Wiltsmum
    Wiltsmum Posts: 38 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary
    Thanks for your response. Yes have full records. We cancelled the PPI in 2009. Card still running.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,049 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Self-employment is not a valid complaint reason unless the policy didn't cover (most did) or the claim terms were considered onerous (e.g. having to dissolve the business)

    Do note before you spend your refund, that cancelling the policy triggers the 3 year time bar (for knowing you had a reason to complain) and the 6 year rule will apply due to the policy being taken out in 1987 so you may well find it rejected with no recourse to the FOS.

    Depending on what the PPI policy was for and how it was sold, 1987 is also pre-regulation so a policy through a broker for a mortgage would also be ineligible for complaint

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Wiltsmum
    Wiltsmum Posts: 38 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary
    Thanks, we have got a number of policies. Only one dates from 1987. The rest 1990s and early 2000s. We have had one back with a large projected sum but I a worried it is a con. We used a handling firm for this.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If you're using a claims company, then you'll be losing half of anything you get, in return for a free stamp.

    Send the complaint yourself.
  • Wiltsmum
    Wiltsmum Posts: 38 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary
    Thank you. We have only used a claims company for one policy- we had 5!
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,207 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The calculators supplied by CMCs overstate the likely amount. We have seen posts on here from people that a) got nothing or b) got a third of what was stated. They make assumptions which usually put the premium at the top end.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Wiltsmum
    Wiltsmum Posts: 38 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary
    Thank you. The figures do make your head spin! My husband is cautious and we are not lucky people. A third would still be good.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,049 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Wiltsmum wrote: »
    Thanks, we have got a number of policies. Only one dates from 1987. The rest 1990s and early 2000s. We have had one back with a large projected sum but I a worried it is a con. We used a handling firm for this.

    Regulation started in 2005 (banks and other groups members of earlier regulatory bodies are covered before that) so any sales from non-regulated bodies like a broker, car dealership etc would not be covered

    The key thing is that closing the card/cancelling the policy can trigger the time bar under the 3 year rule. Once that is done any complaint can be closed without refund/access to FOS

    The rule is

    three years from the date on which the complainant became aware (or ought reasonably to have become aware) that he had cause for complaint;

    Cancelling the policy can trigger the 3 year rule if the firm wishes to

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Wiltsmum
    Wiltsmum Posts: 38 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary
    Thank you. The bit that is worrying me is not the 3 year rule it is the calculations. The policies were sold by the banks not the broker.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.