We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

ETF conundrum

Hello, hope someone can help. I seem to be misunderstanding something...

I am comparing two ETFs, one traded in London the other in the USA. Both are priced in dollars; both track the same index; one charges a slightly higher fee than the other. So I would expect the performance of the two to be very similar (the same volatility and slightly higher returns for the cheaper US version), but in fact Morningstar reports a lot of differences between them. How come?

They are:
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
IEMG
http://performance.morningstar.com/funds/etf/total-returns.action?t=IEMG&region=usa&culture=en-US

and
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | EIMI

http://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/etf/snapshot/snapshot.aspx?id=0P0001377K&tab=1&InvestmentType=FE

Comments

  • A_T
    A_T Posts: 975 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Plot them on the same graph using your second link - they are almost exactly the same.
  • Voyager2002
    Voyager2002 Posts: 16,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    A_T wrote: »
    Plot them on the same graph using your second link - they are almost exactly the same.

    Thanks, but why are the figures for 3-year return 11.83% for the London one but only 8.58% in the USA? Is that simply the difference between mean return and trailing return? Similarly the volatility: 16.19% versus 15.88%.

    Basically these figures make the London version look better, yet if they track the same index in the same currency and the fee is lower in the USA then surely that would always be a better option?
  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    Is it something to do with the dividend payment dates?
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
  • bowlhead99
    bowlhead99 Posts: 12,295 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Post of the Month
    Thanks, but why are the figures for 3-year return 11.83% for the London one but only 8.58% in the USA? Is that simply the difference between mean return and trailing return? Similarly the volatility: 16.19% versus 15.88%.
    Surely your difference is just that when you are visiting the Morningstar UK site as a UK based investor, the Morningstar.co.uk graph of "growth of £1000" and associated percentage performance figures in the tables, are in pounds, because that's how UK investors like to view the returns of one fund compared to another, on that site.

    Whereas the morningstar.com one, set up for the American market, gives returns always displayed in USD.

    As mentioned by others, if you view both funds through the same front-end and display them in the same manner, you should get something comparable.

    The difference between dollars and pounds is always going to be striking because of movements in FX rate. For example in the UK Morningstar site, returns for calendar year 2015, 2016, 2017 for the UK one was -9.9%, 31.4%, 25.9%, while from the Morningstar US site it said the returns were -14.31%, 10.29%, 37.4%.

    So when you are sitting in the US looking at how your emerging markets investments performed in 2016, you get a nice reasonable 10% ish in dollars. But dollars became worth a lot more pounds part way through that year, as a result of Brexit vote, and to a UK person measuring the return in pounds he got 31%.

    Situation reversed a bit as sterling recovered in 2017, so when the Americans got a 37% return in dollars, our return in sterling was 'only' 26% that year.

    So, you might be thinking of buying the USD class (or maybe USD class is the only one available) but if you are looking at it on the Morningstar UK site they will conveniently rebase performance charts and tables to GBP so you can compare with the various rival investment trusts and global or emerging funds that are priced in GBP or Euro.
  • JohnRo
    JohnRo Posts: 2,887 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Be aware several brokers are currently barring UK customers from making US domiciled ETF purchases due the US ETF providers failing to meet the PRIIP regulation which requires a KID for the product being sold.
    'We don't need to be smarter than the rest; we need to be more disciplined than the rest.' - WB
  • Voyager2002
    Voyager2002 Posts: 16,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    bowlhead99 wrote: »

    So, you might be thinking of buying the USD class (or maybe USD class is the only one available) but if you are looking at it on the Morningstar UK site they will conveniently rebase performance charts and tables to GBP so you can compare with the various rival investment trusts and global or emerging funds that are priced in GBP or Euro.

    Thank you: that is what I was missing.

    In fact I have a sum in US dollars that I need to invest, and so am interested in the dollar return on a dollar-priced investment. I had not realised that the Morningstar UK site, when giving returns on an investment priced in dollars, gave those returns in sterling and so introduced FX movements into the result.
  • Voyager2002
    Voyager2002 Posts: 16,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    JohnRo wrote: »
    Be aware several brokers are currently barring UK customers from making US domiciled ETF purchases due the US ETF providers failing to meet the PRIIP regulation which requires a KID for the product being sold.

    Yes, that is a real nuisance. I would imagine that it is not "several" but all brokers, since the PRIIP regulation is part of EU law that has now come into force.

    In practice many US domiciled ETFs do seem to have KIIDs and so the purchase can go through.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.