We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

PPI- Under payments

Hi there,

I applied for PPI refunds back in 2012 via a PPI claims company and did receive payouts from certain companies such as Lloyds TSB, Barclays and Virgin bank. However I’ve received other calls from different PPI companies recently (as has everyone) and have been told that even though I’ve received payouts in 2012 the banks/companies could still owe me money as may have under paid me. I appreciate a few years have passed since I received the refunds and policies/procedures have moved on so was wondering if this was correct, and whether it would be beneficial to go back to those banks to see what they say? Thanks

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    It's not true.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,213 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    However I!!!8217;ve received other calls from different PPI companies recently (as has everyone) and have been told that even though I!!!8217;ve received payouts in 2012 the banks/companies could still owe me money as may have under paid me.

    This is becoming a bit of an FAQ. It is a bit of a scam but like many scams it has an element of truth behind it.

    Some banks are going back over old complaints and reviewing decisions. For example, Lloyds are looking at comparative redress payouts and changing some of those to full refunds. Barclays have been bringing old archived data back onto their systems which is increasing the payment history.

    So, that is the element of truth. However, they are doing this automatically and contacting those affected by it automatically. There is no need for a CMC or you to be involved.

    And the reason why the CMC want to do this is that if they get their name attached to your file and the bank pays an extra amount, that CMC can claim a percentage against it. Despite doing absolutely nothing for it.

    Its a nice little earner for them for no work whatsoever.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.