We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
goodnight MIL
twhitehousescat
Posts: 5,368 Forumite
at last the DVLA has clarified the situation , its only taken them 3 or more yrs
let the good times roll http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2018/04/dvla-clarify-that-parking-companies.html I suspect that at least 80% of there cases are where the motorist did not hand over details to the PPC
happy days but not in Truro
let the good times roll http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2018/04/dvla-clarify-that-parking-companies.html I suspect that at least 80% of there cases are where the motorist did not hand over details to the PPC
happy days but not in Truro
0
Comments
-
And it's goodnight to all those PPC's who sold the personal data on over the last 6 years.twhitehousescat wrote: »at last the DVLA has clarified the situation , its only taken them 3 or more yrs
let the good times roll http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2018/04/dvla-clarify-that-parking-companies.html I suspect that at least 80% of there cases are where the motorist did not hand over details to the PPC
happy days but not in Truro0 -
And it's goodnight to all those PPC's who sold the personal data on over the last 6 years.
yes if they still exist , however in most cases they have changed ownership and new names , for example in this case http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=108819 the DVLA do not get it , they intend to write to and audit Northwest Parking Enforcement. When it was Northwest Parking Management that sold the alleged debt0 -
In the days of wheel clamping it was often advised to go for the principal - ie the one who hired or allowed the clampit in to operate on their land in the first place.
Shouldnt anyone looking at taking action as a result of the MIL debacle shouldn't the landowner also be included / joined to any case?From the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"0 -
yes the land owner that hired the person / company is responsible for there actions ,0
-
MIL have always been easy to beat in any court claim defence (I only know of one lost, presumably badly argued and it wasn't a poster on here or on pepipoo, so none have been lost on the forums, AFAIK).
So now all those people can sue the parking firm who sold the data. They already could, but the DVLA statement gives the evidence people need. For a DPA breach like this, £500 seems about right, according to the CEL and Parking Awareness cases we know about already.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards