POPLA Appeal ParkingEye St. Martin's Precinct

SalomonAssassin

Coupon-mad wrote: »

I would just remove the BPA CoP 36a (bottom of page 11) and the two quotes (top of page 12) because PE did both those things and that's not what you are arguing here.

Oh yeah good spot - thanks. I think mixing those points up is what had me confused before. I've removed that now but I won't re-upload for such a small change.

If that's all then I'll upload that this evening and then come back with the outcome whenever that comes through.

Thank you to everyone who has helped. It's very much appreciated!

SalomonAssassin

Just had an email from POPLA to say ParkingEye do not wish to contest the appeal so another success!

Bit of a shame as I'd have been interested in what an assessor would have had to say especially regarding the ICO point. Out of interest have you guys seen any responses about the ICO point from anyone else yet?

Thank you all for your help. It's very much appreciated!

Coupon-mad

Out of interest have you guys seen any responses about the ICO point from anyone else yet?

Not yet, but it is being tried in POPLA appeals and defences from now on.

I am glad PE backed out and wonder if the DPA breach ANPR/ICO thing bothered them.

Ralph-y

well done ...... shame you never got to test your points .....

did you ever as in 'the deeps' post #4 complain to your MP ?

to refresh

https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2018-02-02/debates/CC84AF5E-AC6E-4E14-81B1-066E6A892807/Parking(CodeOfPractice)Bill

''Rip-offs from car park Cowboys must stop''; unfair treatment; signage deliberately confusing to ensure a PCN is issued; ''years of abuse by rogue parking companies''; bloodsuckers; ''the current system of regulation is hopeless, like putting Dracula in charge of the blood-bank''; extortionate fines; rogue operators; ''sense of injustice''; unfair charges and notices; wilfully misleading; signage is a deliberate act to deceive or mislead; ''confusing signs are often deliberate, to trap innocent drivers''; unreasonable; a curse; harassing; operating in a disgusting way; appeals service is no guarantee of a fair hearing; loathed; outrageous scam; dodgy practice; outrageous abuse; unscrupulous practices; ''the British Parking Association is as much use as a multi-storey car park in the Gobi desert''; and finally, by way of unanimous conclusion: ''we need to crack down on these rogue companies. They are an absolute disgrace to this country. Ordinary motorists and ordinary residents should not have to put up with this''.

These are the exact words used, so you should quote them to your MP in a complaint and ask him/her to contact Sir Greg Knight MP if he wants further information about this scam.



every MP who receives letters from constituents is more likely to support this bill ...... and we do need this bill to progress ...

Ralph:cool: