We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Advice needed

Morning,

I'm after a bit if advice with the wife's PPI claim.

We made a claim against an old Dorothy Perkins store card that she had, Santander (who now own GE Capital who the card was with) wrote back acknowledging the account and the PPI on it.

So far, so good. They gave us the account number, and asked us to fill in the details on the claim, which we did.

Then they gave us a settlement offer based on 'the period of 2005-2018 due to lack of information about the account prior to 2005'

Now for the advice....

The card was taken out in the late 80's and was used regularly, with a large balance and regular payments mainly between then and 2004.
If they have the account number and some information about the account, surely they have the full details of the account?

Would they be offering a lower settlement in the hope that they don't have to pay out on the full amount?
Would a Subject Access Data Request be worth doing to try and get some more information about the account?

Any advice would be appreciated

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,213 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If they have the account number and some information about the account, surely they have the full details of the account?

    Why do you think that? They gave your wife a monthly statement. So, why has she not got copies of all those statements? Because she didnt need to keep them any longer than necessary.

    Firms are the same. Except they have to act within the data protection act. That states information should only be retained for as long as necessary. That is typically 6 years. The regulator told firms to stop destroying data in respect of PPI some years back. That is the only reason they can go back to 2005. What reason do you think that a firm would need to keep statements from 30 years ago?
    Would they be offering a lower settlement in the hope that they don't have to pay out on the full amount?

    no.
    Would a Subject Access Data Request be worth doing to try and get some more information about the account?

    it will cost you £10 and theoretically could result in information. However, its unlikely.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Fair enough lol

    Tbh, I was surprised at the offer they gave her, but there's always the thought that they're trying to minimise their payments

    Thanks for the reply
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.