We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Any Options To Avoid Additional Stamp Duty?
Comments
-
Your lender will not like that one tiny bit - she would need a mortgage in her name to go with the transferred ownership of the property. You could, of course, gift her the monthly payments...ConGirlRed wrote: »I was debating gifting my house to my mum and she leaves it back to me in her will, while I continue to pay the outstanding mortgage
If she owns two properties, then the chances are high that her estate would be liable for IHT on her death - and if she needs residential care, or gets into financial difficulty, then both the properties she owns would would certainly be within her assets.
Pay the tax.Does anyone have any ideas on how I can get round this, without having to sell my house and make my mum go back to her inherited property?
Correct. You do not live there. You are not replacing your primary residence.ConGirlRed wrote: »Really? So I will be charged 3% because I own it, then I can't reclaim it if I buy with the boyfriend and sell it within 3 years, because I don't live there??
Why doesn't she live in the house she owns? Is that rented out, or simply sat empty? Perhaps she could sell that, and buy the one she does live in?I kept my house for my mum to move into if she wanted to, when my Stepdad died.
Sorry, but they're simply accurate.And now I will have to pay severe amounts of tax... so comments like this don't help my situ!
You own one house that you do not live in. You want to buy a second house. You are therefore legally liable for +3% SDLT on that second purchase. Trying to find ways to not pay that are - quite simply - tax evasion. Tax avoidance would be selling the original property, or not being a part-owner of the new one.
I do find it strange that somebody will give away a substantial asset to avoid paying a relatively small amount of tax. It's almost as if they know they aren't really "giving it away"...0 -
Your mum sells the property she has inherited and uses the money to buy the property she lives in from you.0
-
Keep all the properties and cough up the tax, or sell now before interest rates start rising and your properties are worth a lot less.0
-
since your question revolves entirely around whether you wish to commit tax evasion or not then yes, that is what needs to be asked.ConGirlRed wrote: »I kept my house for my mum to move into if she wanted to, when my Stepdad died. And now I will have to pay severe amounts of tax... so comments like this don't help my situ!
- you own a property
- you cannot be party to the purchase of another property without being subject to the higher rate SDLT unless you wish to commit tax evasion. That said it is unlikely you would succeed in evading anyway.
Your mother has a property of her own so don't try and come the its to help her angle. She sounds like she can look after herself.
your options:
- let the BF buy in his name only.
- gift the property to mother (and deal with any Capital gains tax due given it is no longer your main home)
- sell the property and buy the new one jointly with BF as a solo property owner
- keep the property, buy with BF and pay the higher rate0 -
Get married and move in with your boyfriend/husband. Then sell the property he owns and then buy a new home together.
We have discussed that, but I assumed it wouldn't change if we are married or not as I still own a property in my name only which I would rather keep.
Just want to clarify... so if my house IS my main residence I am obviously liable for the 3% but I CAN claim it back.
If it IS NOT my main residence I am liable for the 3% as I own it, but CANNOT claim it back?
Seems I am damned if I do and damned if I don't.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
ConGirlRed wrote: »We have discussed that, but I assumed it wouldn't change if we are married or not as I still own a property in my name only which I would rather keep.
Just want to clarify... so if my house IS my main residence I am obviously liable for the 3% but I CAN claim it back.
If it IS NOT my main residence I am liable for the 3% as I own it, but CANNOT claim it back?
Seems I am damned if I do and damned if I don't.
You know what happens when you assume.....;)
Have you read the guidance note?0 -
For goodness sake you have stakes in multiple properties whilst some people are sleeping in doorways Play the bloody tax0
-
Yes thanks, but it baffles me, hence posting here to get complete clarity.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
Its not an achievement it is a ponzi scheme which has left many people unable to buy their own home and many more due to lose or be in negative equity once rates rise. Pay up that is advice0
-
ConGirlRed wrote: »Yes thanks, but it baffles me, hence posting here to get complete clarity.
I think it's one of the easier tax guides to read especially as it has the examples in the last few chapters. Examples like this one in Chapter 9:Mr and Mrs S, a married couple, each own a residential property, with neither having any interest in the other’s property. They both live in the property owned by Mrs S: the property owned by Mr S is rented out. Mrs S is selling her property and they are jointly purchasing a new one, which will be their new main residence. Mr S will retain his rented out property.
The higher rates will not apply to the joint purchase by Mr and Mrs S of a new main residence. As they are married and have both lived in the property owned by Mrs S as their main residence they will both be treated as replacing their main residence.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
