We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Additional stamp duty

2»

Comments

  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,988 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I agree with Dunroving!!!8217;s comment that the replacement exception will only apply if Mr S has lived in Mrs S!!!8217;s house as his only or main residence.

    I do not consider that the examples from the guidance quoted by 00ec25 are to the contrary.

    The requirement that Mr S lived in the house to be sold as his only or main residence is in the legislation. See FA2003/Sch4ZA/para3(6)(c).
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 31 March 2018 at 5:51PM
    SDLT_Geek wrote: »
    I agree with Dunroving!!!8217;s comment that the replacement exception will only apply if Mr S has lived in Mrs S!!!8217;s house as his only or main residence.

    I do not consider that the examples from the guidance quoted by 00ec25 are to the contrary.

    The requirement that Mr S lived in the house to be sold as his only or main residence is in the legislation. See FA2003/Sch4ZA/para3(6)(c).

    I thought married couples could only have one main residence in terms of SDLT and the OP says that their husband moved into the OP's property so surely the property the OP owns with the sister is the couple's main residence....?

    The OP hasn't given any indication that (s)he has ever lived in the husband's property so surely that property wouldn't count as the couple's main residence...?
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,988 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The point is whether OP!!!8217;s spouse has lived as his main residence in the property in which OP has a share and which OP will be disposing of entirely when buying a new property for OP and spouse to live in.
    It does not depend on OP having lived the property OP!!!8217;s spouse is retaining.

    If the replacement exception applies to OP!!!8217;s spouse then it does not matter how many other properties OP!!!8217;s spouse retains.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.