We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Name the driver - reset the clock?
Comments
- 
            Was everything signed by excel? Nothing from vcs? Just asking in case they ballsed up another one.0
- 
            Perfect, Thankyou Coupon-mad, I had spotted the ANPR defence in the Newbie thread and I am all over that!
 Nosferatu - Its all under Excel Litigation - Either Jake Burgess A.CILEx, (Associate Legal Executive no less) or a Yasmeen Couser (Paralegal) (Although she doesnt seem to like signing her letters there's just a big blank space!)0
- 
            Upsidedowner, I believe we may be contesting Excel from the same car park. I will PM you0
- 
            Yes we are. I'm on my mobile and it wont let me get to the PM for some reason.
 I've read your thread. I managed to track down the agent acting for the landowner if you fancy a last minute pop at them cancelling it for you? The agent wasnt much cop for me but he might take more notice of you due to the discrimination aspect in your case. Good luck!
 The landowner is 'Threadneedle Property Investments' Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London, EC4N 6AG.
 BUT
 The agent acting for them is Rodney Witton (Savills based in Birmingham)
 Tel 0121 200 4509
 Rod.Witton@savills.com
 Savills
 55 Colmore Row
 Birmingham
 West Midlands
 B3 2AA0
- 
            Upsidedowner wrote: »
 I have a question - on the same site where this ticket was issued. A marked police car has been given a PCN (attending a call on the site) he is appealing the ticket and tweeted about it. ' #AnprIsntAlwaysGreat..' .................. It made local press. Is their any mileage in bringing it to the attention of the judge? (defence or witness statement if more appropriate?) Or complete waste of time/irrelevant ?
 (Our local MP has mentioned her backing for the new regulations being discussed in parliament too)
 http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/15804805.Police_car_slapped_with___100_parking_fine___officer_was_trying_to_find_suspected_self_harmer/
 I've contacted the SPC in question to find out how he got on and if his appeal was successful.
 He replied: "Eventually and after requiring further evidence and a statement from a superintendent to confirm I wasn’t lying! But yes, last month I was NFA’d thankfully"0
- 
            I've also contacted the land agent who tells me that Excel lease the car park, therefore, are money grabbing all for themselves!0
- 
            Hi all,
 My defence was sent to CCBC nearly two months ago now and since then i've followed the process as set out here, I received a letter (general form of judgement or order) today from my local court (rather than the central office) saying:
 'Unless the Claimant files and serves fully pleaded particulars of claim the claim shall stand dismissed'
 It also goes on to say I have permission to serve an amended defence should I wish to ??? .
 The particulars were served ages ago - so while I thought I understood the process this has me a little confused!?
 The only thing I can think (other than a mistake by the court?), is that what Excel sent wasn't clear enough and they need to provide something with more basis?
 Bearing that in mind - is that why I'm being given the option to serve an amended defence? In response to a possible change in their particulars?
 Can anyone help clarify for me.0
- 
            
 While we are often being asked to second guess the purpose/meaning of what people have received, it looks like the Judge needs more information in the PoC.The only thing I can think (other than a mistake by the court?), is that what Excel sent wasn't clear enough and they need to provide something with more basis?
 Seems to be the case. We've seen it before in a number of cases (not necessarily Excel).Bearing that in mind - is that why I'm being given the option to serve an amended defence? In response to a possible change in their particulars?
 Which court? Skipton Court is pretty severe on PPCs and their PoCs.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
 I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
 Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0
- 
            Bearing that in mind - is that why I'm being given the option to serve an amended defence? In response to a possible change in their particulars?
 Yes, the Judge doesn't like the rubbish POC they filed.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
 CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
 Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
- 
            Thanks for the replies.
 The court is Darlington (Co Durham).
 I'll sit tight again. Thanks as always!0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
          
          
         
