We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Investment Bond Wrapper & Supermarkets

124

Comments

  • Many thanks for a very comprehensive answer. Just to pursue the charge bit, you are saying that despite what the product literature says (Selestia very clearly states 5% fee on intial investment) the actual negotiable charges might well be different depending on IFA, network used etc. This being the case I could potentially put money in a bond for much the same charges as I could from a discount broker I.e. total charge = 0 to 0.25% for initial charge and 1.5% - 2% for AMG / TER.

    I find that when I read the product literature for bonds it is far from transparent exactly what fees / charges are payable hence me keeping asking questions.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,850 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I have the Norwich Union Investment Bond arranged through an IFA.

    I invested £100,000 and commission paid to the IFA was 1%. Initial allocation was £107,500 - this is what NU invest initially for me made up through reduced commission taken by the IFA and a special offer at the time. AMC is 1.2%.

    http://www.norwichunion.com/investment-bond/index.htm

    Mine is the Portfolio Stepdown option.

    http://adviser.norwichunion.com/product-literature/files/in/in50006c.pdf
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    jem16 wrote: »
    I invested £100,000 and commission paid to the IFA was 1%. Initial allocation was £107,500 - this is what NU invest initially for me made up through reduced commission taken by the IFA and a special offer at the time. AMC is 1.2%.



    The bond appears to take additional fund charges on top(TAC). How much are they for your chosen funds?
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,850 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The 1.2% figure I quoted takes into account all charges.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,288 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Many thanks for a very comprehensive answer. Just to pursue the charge bit, you are saying that despite what the product literature says (Selestia very clearly states 5% fee on intial investment) the actual negotiable charges might well be different depending on IFA, network used etc. This being the case I could potentially put money in a bond for much the same charges as I could from a discount broker I.e. total charge = 0 to 0.25% for initial charge and 1.5% - 2% for AMG / TER.

    5% assumes maximum commission. That will range from 3.5 to 4.5% depending on what the IFA has negotiated. The best you can expect is an initial charge of 0.5% (although that is more typical of investments in excess of £200k).
    I find that when I read the product literature for bonds it is far from transparent exactly what fees / charges are payable hence me keeping asking questions.

    The documentation is written to be presented with a personal illustration where the charges are fully disclosed. If you are just looking at key feature documents and brochures, then you are only getting one bit of the information.
    The bond appears to take additional fund charges on top(TAC). How much are they for your chosen funds?

    NU takes a 1% starting point (mainly for internal funds) and then external funds have an additional charge to make the full annual management charge.

    One of the big advantages of NU is that they have a big initial allocation and a good range of internal funds. This can keep the reduction in yield over 10 years down below 1.5%.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    jem16 wrote: »
    The 1.2% figure I quoted takes into account all charges.


    That's not what it says on the link you posted above.
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,288 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    EdInvestor wrote: »
    That's not what it says on the link you posted above.

    The illustrations issued would take into account the annual management charges of the individual funds so the RIY Jem is talking about it correct.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,850 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    EdInvestor wrote: »
    That's not what it says on the link you posted above.

    I posted the link for information purposes on the product not the charges. If you look at the link again, you will see that it mentions initial allocation on £100k to be £102,500 and not the £107,500 that I actually got.

    As explained by Dunstonh the information published on the website is generic. My specific figures came from my personal illustration and were only given as a guide as to what could be achieved.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    jem16 wrote: »
    If you look at the link again, you will see that it mentions initial allocation on £100k to be £102,500 and not the £107,500 that I actually got.


    Interested to hear what yur early cash-in charges would be.

    The link quotes 11% in year 1, 8% year 2, 6% year 3, etc to year 5.
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,288 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The early cash in charges are what you show. However, there are clean versions available but you dont get the increased allocation.

    The early cash in charges are not a problem as you shouldnt be investing for a couple of years only anyway. Better to take the increased allocation rather than a clean one with no tie in.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.