We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Expected to pay for another Flats new windows
Comments
-
If the council have issued and abatement order because the windows aren't safe, that doesn't defiantly mean that they have to be replaced, could the offending window be boarded up to make it safe? If the property is empty I would be checking the building insurance as this could make it invalid (and would impact all the leaseholders)
The management company have to go through section 20 consultation for any works over £250 per flat. There are some emergency powers but that would just be to make the window safe - which is not the same as replacing the windows.
You may be a just a shareholder but you have a responsibility to help make sure that the building is properly managed. This is the problem where the leaseholders jointly own the freehold - people sit back and expect the directors to do all the work, the directors aren't normally paid and its a role no one wants so the building ends up being badly looked after and maintained. I think the better approach is that every leaseholder has to be a company director - then everyone has the same responsibility to look after the building.0 -
Soundgirlrocks wrote: »The management company have to go through section 20 consultation for any works over £250 per flat. There are some emergency powers but that would just be to make the window safe - which is not the same as replacing the windows.
The windows aren't the freeholders/management company's responsibility - so a section 20 consultation isn't relevant....Paul_Silsby wrote: »The Leases are clear that the flat owners are all responsible for their own windows (apart from the painting).
The leaseholder is breaching a covenant (to maintain the windows) - so the freeholder needs to take action against the leaseholder for a breach of covenant.0 -
-
The windows need replacing.
The freeholder is responsible, in the absence of a leaseholder.
The freeholder has no monies of their own available.
Ergo, the shareholders in the freeholder company HAVE to inject the funds into the company. Nobody else is going to...
Bear in mind, however, that "unoccupied" is not the same as "no leaseholder". Somebody owns that flat's lease, whether somebody lives there or not...
In extremis, the flat's lease can ultimately be cancelled if nobody's paying the service charge/ground rent/maintenance costs... But that doesn't cover the costs of the window in the short term.0 -
Thankyou , yes I will email the Directors and advise them to do this as it is in the best interests of the Leaseholders.0
-
Well yes, I take your point, the problem is that I suspect that a number of Leaseholders will refuse to pay which will have a knock on effect to some others who will pay but only if all Leaseholders pay. Do you not think that the Council should pursue the owner of the Flat who is legally responsible according to his Lease and therefore avoid causing all the other Leaseholders so much inconvenience. Or would they wait whilst the offending flat owner was issued with an Invoice for the works and then possibly to be taken to the small claims court ?.0
-
You've been there 36years so obviously invested in the property, why not step up and join as a director? (no idea how you do that!). If you are potentially liable, and can see there are issues such as no sinking fund, some people aren't paying - then step up to get these resolved.0
-
Paul_Silsby wrote: »Do you not think that the Council should pursue the owner of the Flat who is legally responsible according to his Lease and therefore avoid causing all the other Leaseholders so much inconvenience.
It's the freeholder's problem as to who holds one of their leases for a flat in their building...
Windows would normally be part of the fabric of the building, so the freeholder's problem.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards