ukpc PCN outside markings POPLA draft

taleb

Umkomaas wrote: »

@taleb - having re-read your POPLA appeal, I would rearrange the sections by bringing the 'No Keeper Liability' section to the fore, making it appeal point #1. Follow that with 'The Operator has not shown the individual it is pursuing is in fact the driver... ' as appeal point #2, then come in with 'Signage' as #3.

'No Keeper Liability' is not open to POPLA assessor subjectivity, whereas 'Signage' can be. Get the appeal upheld by the assessor at the earliest opportunity, rather than giving them scope to start to mentally side with the operator.

I would also embolden the text 42 days to highlight just how wrong UKPC have got this for them to try to invoke Keeper Liability.

thanks Umkomaas, I have now submitted the appeal with the sections rearranged.
but as I did it before reading your comment, the only change I made was to move the 'No keeper liability' to be the first section, before signage
let's see what the outcome is ...

taleb

just wanted to let everyone know that we have WON, UKPC didn't even contest the appeal...
they had the cheek though to send me a letter saying that they've withdrawn the charge as a goodwill gesture (nothing to do with their utter incompetence!!!)

Thanks to everyone here for all the help, I'll try to spread the word so that others know how to avoid being ripped off by these fraudsters

keep up the good work,
cheers