We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

BW Legal for VCS county court claim

167891012»

Comments

  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 155,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 29 September 2018 at 1:06PM
    Hooray! Another one bites the dust! :T

    You can't counter claim on the back of this claim, but you could try sending your costs schedule (for any costs so far, including time spent on the case since 2016!) to the named Judge and see if they will grant summary costs due to the Claimant's 'wholly unreasonable conduct' from start to finish in a case where they knew from an appeal in 2016 that your car WAS NOT even parked in their car park, so they never had a cause of action and this claim was purely and utterly vexatious and intimidating to try to extort money.

    Really go to town on explaining in your covering letter why VCS had no cause of action and why VCS already KNEW that.
    The keeper was not the driver on that day and the car was not parked in their car at all on that day.
    Also, plan of attack #2 (this could get you money):

    Send your evidence to the ICO in a formal online complaint; the focus must be on DATA MISUSE and so you would be showing that VCS knew the car was not in their car park but spent TWO YEARS hounding you to the court door before discontinuing when someone finally bothered to check their 'evidence'.

    Attach your evidence that proves the car was not in their car park, and attach the appeal, the correspondence that told VCS about the fact your car was NOT there, and the court claim.

    Make the case to the ICO that VCS had no justification to process your data AT ALL, yet they continued to do so for over two years, demanding money with menaces and using the court process as a vehicle of intimidation, costing you wasted time & money, and significant distress.

    If the ICO investigation agrees, I believe they can grant compensation but even so, a positive ICO complaint result can then be used next year as compelling evidence to sue VCS for damages for distress, based on the DPA data misuse and the Protection from Harassment Act and you could claim, say, £750 or more and would have good prospects of success if it was well pleaded based on those statutes, and evidenced.

    Start sending emails and Facebook posts to family & friends that tell them how relieved you are but how horribly distressing the entire experience has been (lay it in thick, pour your heart out, talk about lost sleep and headaches and any real moments of despair). Keep those sent emails/posts, screenshot them and put them in your file ready for a case v VCS next year, and that will be your evidence of 'pure distress' for which the law allows the remedy of compensation.
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • Djdamo
    Djdamo Posts: 53 Forumite
    edited 29 September 2018 at 7:31PM
    Thanks Coupon-mad, I tried to send you a personal thanks but your inbox isn't accepting messages. Anyway very much appreciate all your advice and help with the case.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,376 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Coupon makes a interesting suggestion if you are up to taking it forward through the courts. Ticketing on the highway is civil fraud so they have no defence apart from the defence of incompetance.

    You could though still get the local council Trading Standards on to it as there could have been others. And if they continue beyond this, then the defence of incompetance can't stand.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.