We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MSE News: England and Northern Ireland facing...
Options
Comments
-
Because people are relying more and more on Contactless and Mobile payments and so they can't work it out. Proves that people who handle cash more often know what they are using and spending, I know I do.
There was an article on the BBC News this week about people throwing away (i.e. putting in the bin) their penies and tuppences.
I'd argue that people who use cash most often are probably the least financially literate.0 -
Suppose a litre of cola costs $3.15. If you buy one-third of a litre of cola, how much will you pay?
Probably about $1.50 to $2, give or take. Anyone who has ever bought soft drinks in the supermarket will realise that big bottles are better value for money than smaller ones.
And if you're paying $3.15 for a litre of cola, you really need to find another shop.If it sticks, force it.
If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.0 -
And the government, apparently, wants us all to have a mandatory Personal Tax Account by 2019.
HMRC must be rubbing it's hands in glorious expectation of millions of £100 penalties in 2020. :rotfl:Warning: In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
0 -
worried_jim wrote: »Most people are as thick as the proverbial. I'm amazed they make it through the day.
Thats the bottom line.
I think humanity has peaked. 100 years ago if you would too stupid to earn money you died. Now we pay them to sit at home and breed.0 -
Thats the bottom line.
I think humanity has peaked. 100 years ago if you would too stupid to earn money you died. Now we pay them to sit at home and breed.
If that were true, I think it would make us (those paying them to sit at home and breed) the stupid onesYou keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
unholyangel wrote: »If that were true, I think it would make us (those paying them to sit at home and breed) the stupid ones
We are .0 -
unholyangel wrote: »If that were true, I think it would make us (those paying them to sit at home and breed) the stupid onesworried_jim wrote: »We are .
Because we don't have a choice about it.0 -
worried_jim wrote: »We are .
We don't pay people to sit at home and breed. We have welfare, which unfortunately is taken advantage of by a small minority who know how to play the system.
The truth is, very few parents pay enough in tax to cover what is spent by the state on our children, never mind anything else. Their education alone is at a cost of £6-8k per child per year.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
The current generation (and probably the one before) certainly. Those of us who learned the basic "3 Rs" and weren't allowed to use calculators in exams, know exactly how much change we are due. These so-called "studies" are meaningless.Proud member of the wokerati, though I don't eat tofu.Home is where my books are.Solar PV 5.2kWp system, SE facing, >1% shading, installed March 2019.Mortgage free July 20230
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards