We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
To install UFH in the hallway or not?
Comments
-
I have found a couple of photos from when the screed was laid in the back utility, you can see what I mean about the pipes being on the insulation but inside the 'slab'. This is in the highest (third level) and is mostly stud walls, but you can get the idea.0
-
That's useful thanks - if we have to dig the concrete slab out we will 'refill' with limecrete and then the pipes will sit on that and be screed on top. If not then the will sit on insulation on the concrete slab and the screed will go on top.
IS that a pic of the change of levels? Where the screed gets very thick?“Isn't this enough? Just this world? Just this beautiful, complex
Wonderfully unfathomable, natural world” Tim Minchin0 -
No it's not the change in level area. The screed is the same thickness all over but the top photo makes it look less thick due to the angle and the edge of the screed facing us. I don't have a pic of the screed at the level changes (builder's photos) but if you imagine the screed going up to the level change and the pipes fed underneath the step area (inside the step if you like) back up to the new change in level with screed on top.0
-
I should probably add that we needed to make changes to the existing heating system anyway as we were knocking walls out etc and the boiler was ancient. If the heating system had been fine and didn't require changes we probably wouldn't have gone to the expense. Ours is an overlay system as we have a suspended wooden floor. So if I take floor coverings up we can see the pipes. The rooms are heated so much more evenly and I reckon we use less gas than a conventional radiator system.0
-
I should probably add that we needed to make changes to the existing heating system anyway as we were knocking walls out etc and the boiler was ancient. If the heating system had been fine and didn't require changes we probably wouldn't have gone to the expense. Ours is an overlay system as we have a suspended wooden floor. So if I take floor coverings up we can see the pipes. The rooms are heated so much more evenly and I reckon we use less gas than a conventional radiator system.
We are doing a period restoration, and putting in eco heating - so going from LPG to ground source heat pump - we are going to be pulling up floor, exposing stone fireplaces, finding hidden walls etc. Going to be messy. May as well pop in under floor heating as well and the radiator system is over 20 years old and could do with an overhaul anyway. Boiler is not particularly old but LPG is very expensive to run.“Isn't this enough? Just this world? Just this beautiful, complex
Wonderfully unfathomable, natural world” Tim Minchin0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards