We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

T junction Accident

24

Comments

  • reeac
    reeac Posts: 1,430 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    If you saw all that happen then why did you pull out?

    Presumably the overtaking and the pulling out happened simultaneously. I think that the overtaking at a road junction should be the significant factor. I had exactly the same situation once except that the overtaker was a motorcyclist and it was a near miss with lots of shouting from the latter. ....all very silly.
  • Wendy64 wrote: »
    Yes the other car was on the wrong side of the road and was turning into the lane i was coming out of
    Got it. As you have a witness, I think you have a good chance of a claim as the other driver was driving carelessly - in fact borderline dangerous driving (far below the standard of a reasonable and careful driver).

    However, the catch will always be that there is an argument that you did not check that it was safe to proceed. Personally, I'd say that the behaviour of the other driver is so poor it is unreasonable to hold you to account. Myself, I'd be tempted to report it to the police as you have a witness.
  • spadoosh
    spadoosh Posts: 8,732 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Doesnt make much sense to me.

    Youre at a t junction wanting to turn right, loads of traffic coming from the left (the lane you want to go in). A lorry from the right flashes you out whilst simultaneously a car behind them overtakes the lorry and tries to turn down the road youre coming from.

    How was the car behind the lorry able to overtake if traffic was heavy and crawling on the main carriageway. The lane youre saying they used to over take wouldve been full of slow moving cars the way youve described it.

    Im not saying extremities dont happen, i know cyclist often face problems of being overtaken and then someone trying to turn left immediately but a car overtaking a lorry to do it?


    If its as you suggest i would say 100% the other driver is at fault. Unless you have decent witness and good evidence though i dont think youll convince the insurer enough for them to fight it
  • EssexExile
    EssexExile Posts: 6,496 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    spadoosh wrote: »
    Doesnt make much sense to me.

    Youre at a t junction wanting to turn right, loads of traffic coming from the left (the lane you want to go in). A lorry from the right flashes you out whilst simultaneously a car behind them overtakes the lorry and tries to turn down the road youre coming from.

    How was the car behind the lorry able to overtake if traffic was heavy and crawling on the main carriageway. The lane youre saying they used to over take wouldve been full of slow moving cars the way youve described it.

    Im not saying extremities dont happen, i know cyclist often face problems of being overtaken and then someone trying to turn left immediately but a car overtaking a lorry to do it?


    If its as you suggest i would say 100% the other driver is at fault. Unless you have decent witness and good evidence though i dont think youll convince the insurer enough for them to fight it
    The flashing lorry (dirty boy) was coming from the left.
    OP, your witness isn't your passenger is it? They don't carry much weight. As others have said, the insurance company will probably decide, unless you feel like challenging them if they go 50:50.
    Tall, dark & handsome. Well two out of three ain't bad.
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 34,998 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    spadoosh wrote: »
    Doesnt make much sense to me.

    Youre at a t junction wanting to turn right, loads of traffic coming from the left (the lane you want to go in). A lorry from the right flashes you out whilst simultaneously a car behind them overtakes the lorry and tries to turn down the road youre coming from.

    How was the car behind the lorry able to overtake if traffic was heavy and crawling on the main carriageway. The lane youre saying they used to over take wouldve been full of slow moving cars the way youve described it.
    I think you have completely misunderstood. ;)

    Lorry on left in slow moving traffic. OP turning right out of junction. Lorry on left lets op out into slow moving traffic. Car on left overtakes lorry to turn right into junction op is emerging from.

    Nearly happened to me the other day turning left out of a junction. Looked left, slow moving traffic, looked right nothing coming, started to pull out and car from left decided to overtake 3 cars to come into my junction.
  • NBLondon
    NBLondon Posts: 5,722 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    spadoosh wrote: »
    Youre at a t junction wanting to turn right, loads of traffic coming from the left (the lane you want to go in). A lorry from the right flashes you out whilst simultaneously a car behind them overtakes the lorry and tries to turn down the road youre coming from.
    I read it as the lorry was coming from the left; flashed to allow Wendy to turn in front of it and the other vehicle overtook the lorry to turn right into the road Wendy was emerging from. Which really suggests the other car was not paying attention as even if Wendy didn't move they would have to go across her nose...

    I used to see a lot of this - whiz up the other side to pass a queue and then turn right - in morning rush hour near the Blackwall Tunnel.
    I need to think of something new here...
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I believe theres case law on similar circumstance. Such as powell v moody where the overtaking vehicle (biker) was 80% liable and the emerging car was 20%.

    In OP's case, I'd expect liability to be greater on their part unless they were inching out and their vision of that car was obstructed (I wouldve expected it to come into view as soon as it pulled out from behind the lorry but this might not be accurate depending on road layout).
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
  • Wendy64
    Wendy64 Posts: 6 Forumite
    There was a no traffic coming from the right when the lorry let me out ..it was heavy traffic from the left ..right side traffic was clear
  • Wendy64
    Wendy64 Posts: 6 Forumite
    No witness is pedestrian who saw the lorry flash to let me out
  • societys_child
    societys_child Posts: 7,110 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    See it regularly, in stationary traffic, someone 'nipping' down the wrong side of the road, to make right turn.
    Usually foot-to-floor to beat any oncoming traffic.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.