We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
higher standard rate vs higher unit rate?
stickyvicci
Posts: 1 Newbie
in Energy
what is best in term of looking at tariffs. having a higher standard rate with lower unit rate or having a higher nit rate with a lower standard rate
0
Comments
-
Entirely depends upon your consumption!0
-
Indeed....
The accepted logic is that users with high use benefit from tariffs with a high standing charge and low unit rate.
Low users benefit from low standing charge and higher unit rates.
However.....as I often say....this does not really matter....
It is a red herring to get caught up on how the tariff is structured..
As long as you have accurate kwh figures base on your annual consumption, and you use this in a comparison site......whatever comes up as cheapest, regardless of how it is structured....is the cheapest...
A comparison site does all the work for you.....0 -
AS others have said, if you are a high user then you might benefit from a lower unit rate and higher standing charge and lower users usually benefit from a lower standing charge and slightly higher unit rate but for most people with average consumption the difference is only a couple of ££'s.
Use a comparison site and put in your annual consumption in kwh. Then if you are really interested do it again by increasing your consumption by 20% and then reducing by 20% and see if it makes much difference.
Playing about with the figures on a comparison site wont cost you anything but give you the opportunity to explore differnt scenarios - totally ignore the "savings" it's what you have to pay that countsNever under estimate the power of stupid people in large numbers0 -
CashStrapped wrote: »Indeed....
The accepted logic is that users with high use benefit from tariffs with a high standing charge and low unit rate.
Low users benefit from low standing charge and higher unit rates.
However.....as I often say....this does not really matter....
It is a red herring to get caught up on how the tariff is structured..
As long as you have accurate kwh figures base on your annual consumption, and you use this in a comparison site......whatever comes up as cheapest, regardless of how it is structured....is the cheapest...
A comparison site does all the work for you.....
Imho, it matters in one key respect only which is higher than projected usage (eg; very cold Winter). This is why I run three comparisons for gas using my annual projected figure then plus/minus 10%. Sometimes it changes the supplier/tariff and sometimes it doesn't.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

