We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

higher standard rate vs higher unit rate?

what is best in term of looking at tariffs. having a higher standard rate with lower unit rate or having a higher nit rate with a lower standard rate

Comments

  • Andy_WSM
    Andy_WSM Posts: 2,217 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Uniform Washer Rampant Recycler
    Entirely depends upon your consumption!
  • CashStrapped
    CashStrapped Posts: 1,294 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Indeed....

    The accepted logic is that users with high use benefit from tariffs with a high standing charge and low unit rate.

    Low users benefit from low standing charge and higher unit rates.

    However.....as I often say....this does not really matter....

    It is a red herring to get caught up on how the tariff is structured..

    As long as you have accurate kwh figures base on your annual consumption, and you use this in a comparison site......whatever comes up as cheapest, regardless of how it is structured....is the cheapest...

    A comparison site does all the work for you.....
  • matelodave
    matelodave Posts: 8,771 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    AS others have said, if you are a high user then you might benefit from a lower unit rate and higher standing charge and lower users usually benefit from a lower standing charge and slightly higher unit rate but for most people with average consumption the difference is only a couple of ££'s.

    Use a comparison site and put in your annual consumption in kwh. Then if you are really interested do it again by increasing your consumption by 20% and then reducing by 20% and see if it makes much difference.

    Playing about with the figures on a comparison site wont cost you anything but give you the opportunity to explore differnt scenarios - totally ignore the "savings" it's what you have to pay that counts
    Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large numbers
  • System
    System Posts: 178,186 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Indeed....

    The accepted logic is that users with high use benefit from tariffs with a high standing charge and low unit rate.

    Low users benefit from low standing charge and higher unit rates.

    However.....as I often say....this does not really matter....

    It is a red herring to get caught up on how the tariff is structured..

    As long as you have accurate kwh figures base on your annual consumption, and you use this in a comparison site......whatever comes up as cheapest, regardless of how it is structured....is the cheapest...

    A comparison site does all the work for you.....

    Imho, it matters in one key respect only which is higher than projected usage (eg; very cold Winter). This is why I run three comparisons for gas using my annual projected figure then plus/minus 10%. Sometimes it changes the supplier/tariff and sometimes it doesn't.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 451.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 239.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 615.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.1K Life & Family
  • 252.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.