We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Car Insurance 25% increase for CUE entry
Options

hiltonian09
Posts: 4 Newbie
in Motoring
Hi
I am after some advice I recently got a quote via Admiral for £550 per year ( Car Insurance 8 years no claims ) which i was happy with we then proceeded only for it to increase by £200 because there was an incident on the CUE database.
Spoke to the liability team who deal with CUE queries who informed me that there was a "Incident" that was reported back in 2016, however no claim was ever made and I was not at fault.
The actual incident was in a car park where a car bumped into my stationary car, at the time it was dark and i wasn't sure of the damage so i reported it in case there were issues down the line. In the end it was only a small dint and nobody claimed / paid for repairs we just carried on.
My question is why would i get a price increase of around 25% due to a none claimed incident that wasn't my fault.
I have a feeling i was overcharged last year also, what are my options here as clearly this cannot be right. Even if my risk factor goes up because of the incident it doesn't warrant an increase in price by 200 quid.
I am after some advice I recently got a quote via Admiral for £550 per year ( Car Insurance 8 years no claims ) which i was happy with we then proceeded only for it to increase by £200 because there was an incident on the CUE database.
Spoke to the liability team who deal with CUE queries who informed me that there was a "Incident" that was reported back in 2016, however no claim was ever made and I was not at fault.
The actual incident was in a car park where a car bumped into my stationary car, at the time it was dark and i wasn't sure of the damage so i reported it in case there were issues down the line. In the end it was only a small dint and nobody claimed / paid for repairs we just carried on.
My question is why would i get a price increase of around 25% due to a none claimed incident that wasn't my fault.
I have a feeling i was overcharged last year also, what are my options here as clearly this cannot be right. Even if my risk factor goes up because of the incident it doesn't warrant an increase in price by 200 quid.
0
Comments
-
Try another company.0
-
You got an increase because they deem you a higher risk.
Having one incident now, but statistics say your likely to have another.Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...0 -
I agree but should the price increase by over 25% . Surely the risk hasn't increased by 25% i would expect the increase to be inline with the risk.
The fact that i was not in the car at the time should also factor into this. It has nothing to do with my driving. I am more after what can i do to question this / amend the CUE database as it must not have all the facts on their otherwise the increase would not be that high.0 -
You may be penalised for not declaring that you had an incident at renewal?"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
hiltonian09 wrote: ».... I am more after what can i do to question this / amend the CUE database as it must not have all the facts on their otherwise the increase would not be that high.0
-
You were asked if you'd been involved in any collision, whether a claim was made or not. You said no. But that wasn't true - and there's a record of it.
Try other insurers, and this time be honest...
Admiral are the Ryanair of insurers, and will take every possible opportunity to add on costs and charges.Go to the CUE website and you will find the way to find out what is recorded about you, then take it from what you find if you want to challenge it0 -
The OP knows what's there - because they were the one who reported it when it happened...
According the OP's post #4 the OP wants to know why all the facts originally given haven't been recorded correctly:0 -
No, they're assuming there's other stuff on there, because the increase is higher than they'd expect.
Part of the high increase may be punitive for the lie on the proposal. Part of it may simply be Admiral saying "Nope, not for us". There is no simple linear correlation.0 -
You may now not match Admirals target customer. Instead of refusing you insurance, something you definitely don't want, they increase the premium to encourage you to go somewhere else.0
-
Count yourself lucky they did these checks now and not after you took the policy out. Probably would have been even more for failing to disclose material facts.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards