Duplicate post please ignore

cazyp

Below is the outline of my popla appeal as registered keeper.
Am I quoting the correct sections please?
Also should this be attached on the popla site by PDF - worried that if i log in to submit the appeal that its a once only deal so want to get everything ready first.
Do these look ok?
Thanks

POPLA APPEAL NOTES
Summary:
23/11/17 PCN from UKPC received on windscreen
18/12/17 Appealed to UKPC as Keeper requesting cancellation or POPLA code as per template
19/12/17 received email with a PDF demanding driver name before they will consider appeal.
28/12/17 received notice to keeper
25/01/18 Received Notification letter requesting payment within 14 days or details will be passed to recovery agent
30/01/18 Used appeal service again to contest the charge as Keeper and/or request POPLA code using original template letter
14/02/18 Received appeal denial and POPLA code.




Appealing as registered keeper based on:
1. No signs on entrance Contrary to BPACoP Appendix B, sec 18 & section28 ; Video evidence of this.

2. Sign was not readable from parking space. 18.3 states You must place signs containing the specific parking terms throughout the site, so that drivers are given the chance to read them at the time of parking or leaving their vehicle. (picture taken from parking space at the time of receiving PCN showing signs at least 50m away on lamp posts)

3. Vehicle was in car park less than 10 mins (statement of proof inc shop receipt) - grace period should apply to allow time to read the signs and decide whether to park. No Grace period of 10 minutes applied contrary to BPACoP Sec 13

4. No proof of written authorisation of land owner provided as required by BPACoP sec 7
No creditor info / landowner contract has been forthcoming

5. BPACoP 19.10 states: ;If an Operator seeks to use extracts from the !!!8216;ParkingEye v Beavis; judgement laid down by the Supreme Court, the judgement must be referenced and that extracts from it must be properly quoted. Best practice would be adding the website link to the summary of the judgement, when making reference to it.'

Correspondence received from UKPC 14/02/18 used extracts from Beavis vs parking eye namely:;Beavis vs parking eye case which stated that the amount of the parking charge should be adequately brought to the attention of the motorist as well as the requirements of the BPA code of practice.

The extract was not referenced and properly quoted. There is no link to the summary of the judgement.

KeithP

If this is related to your earlier thread then please post it on that earlier thread.

You will find that many people will not search for background info.
Make it easy for others to help you.

Having done that perhaps replace the above text with something like "Duplicate thread - please ignore".

cazyp

Hi Keith - is there a way to change the actual thread title of my previous thread to show that im at the popla stage though?
Thanks

KeithP

cazyp wrote: »

Hi Keith - is there a way to change the actual thread title of my previous thread to show that im at the popla stage though?
Thanks

Yes there is - if you really want to.

Go into edit on your opening post, choose go advanced then edit the title as required.

cazyp

Ah it won't let me.
Ok.
Die thread, die.