We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bank won't lend money.

Selling our 1930's house. It has first floor extension built in 1996 with planning permission, building regulations and completion certificate. The people buying our property have Cash and mortgage but the bank they are borrowing the mortgage with won't lend them the money as they are questioning the construction of said extention. How can they do this when everything was done legally and correctly in line with the regulations in 1996. I agree that regulations have changed but it feels like we're being penalised for something that was done right at the time. Has this happened to anyone else? Any advice gratefully accepted. Thank you.
«1

Comments

  • Fisa002
    Fisa002 Posts: 145 Forumite
    Do you know what the actual reasoning is behind the refusal? What does the bank say is actually wrong with the extension
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    To answer your question they can do this because it’s their money...

    Now another lender may think differently but blaming the bank is not going to fix the situation
  • jimbog
    jimbog Posts: 2,283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    They may be softening you up ready to reduce their offer - there may be little if anything wrong with it
    Gather ye rosebuds while ye may
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Pippa65 wrote: »
    first floor extension built in 1996 with planning permission, building regulations and completion certificate. the bank won't lend them the money as they are questioning the construction of said extention. How can they do this when everything was done legally and correctly in line with the regulations in 1996. I agree that regulations have changed but it feels like we're being penalised for something that was done right at the time. Has this happened to anyone else? Any advice gratefully accepted.
    You'll need to explain what you mean by "questioning the construction". Do you mean the surveyor has some concern about a defect in the extension? If so then there's nothing unreasonable about them asking questions - and just because it was compliant with regulations at the time doesn't necessarily mean it'll still be in great condition 22 years later.
  • Most importantly is it complaint to todays regs?
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Most importantly is it complaint to todays regs?
    utterly irrelevant since it does not need to be
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Most importantly is it complaint to todays regs?
    \
    Rubbish. Thats not important at all. No house built more than few months ago will be.
  • Most importantly is it complaint* to todays regs?
    *Did you mean compliant?

    Anyway, if that was so important every house would have to be rebuilt before it could be sold.
  • Not enough information here to tell: it needs more specific detail on what the bank's concern is with the construction of the extension.

    As an example, some banks do not lend on properties with extensions that have concrete walls, even where they meet the building regulations, other banks will lend on such properties.
  • No fault with construction they just don't seem to like it being timber framed with correct amount of insulation, plasterboards inside and rendered and pebble dashed outside as per regulations in 1996.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.