We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Passive Investing
Comments
-
- The S&P 500 appears to have significantly outperformed the world trackers from about 2010
How about the period before that when US equities significantly underperformed for many years?
The problem with single sector investing is that you are gambling on that sector being the best all the time. It wont be. Using a period of good growth in US equities is not a good measure as you need to compare the periods of poor growth as well.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
stphnstevey wrote: »In terms of Passive Investing in a tracker, I have looked at a world tracker vs S&P 500 tracker
- The S&P 500 appears to have significantly outperformed the world trackers from about 2010
- World trackers consist of at least 50% US based companies
- World tracker top 10 holdings are all US based companies
- Any drop in the US market is likely to be mirrored in other world markets, so the extra 50% diversity doesn't seem worthwhile
- World trackers hold such small amounts of other markets (10% of emerging markets), that any upside is not really going to make a significant difference
- World trackers start from about 0.13% OCF (several are higher) were as S&P 500 trackers are half that at 0.07% OCF
Risky to put all one's eggs in one basket. At the end of the 80s Japan was where the US is now with over 40% of the global stock market - now it's down to about 10%0 -
stphnstevey wrote: »In terms of Passive Investing in a tracker, I have looked at a world tracker vs S&P 500 tracker
- The S&P 500 appears to have significantly outperformed the world trackers from about 2010
- World trackers consist of at least 50% US based companies
- World tracker top 10 holdings are all US based companies
- Any drop in the US market is likely to be mirrored in other world markets, so the extra 50% diversity doesn't seem worthwhile
- World trackers hold such small amounts of other markets (10% of emerging markets), that any upside is not really going to make a significant difference
- World trackers start from about 0.13% OCF (several are higher) were as S&P 500 trackers are half that at 0.07% OCF
If you take as small a time period as 8 years you can prove anything:
1/1/2002-1/1/2010: FTSEworld ex US +85%, S&P 500 +2%.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards