We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

PPI Help please?

Having now received the final letter form the Finance company, my PPI reclaim has been rejected.

Here is an extract from their letter giving the reason:
We invited you to contact us regarding the amount of commission and profit share taken by us from the premiums you paid during your agreement.

As per Financial Conduct Authority guidelines, you are not eligible for redress if your PPI policy was purchased before 6 April 2007, and ended before 6 April 2008

As your agreement was purchased on 16/07/2003 and ended on 16/07/2006 you are unfortunately out of scope for a refund.

In summary, Is this legal can they actually use this loophole not to pay?
I would appreciate some help on this please, thanks in advance.

Cheers Supersaver7

Comments

  • It's not a loophole, it's regulations and is legal.
  • Hi
    I need some help with the claims guys they closed my accout as the funding corporation said the dealt with my claim but i got nothing anyway i got a letter from the funding corp saying i was due a payout through plevin. My question is do i have to pay the claims guys there fee as they closed my account in november befor my plevin payment was decided.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,290 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    In summary, Is this legal can they actually use this loophole not to pay?

    You havent mentioned any loophole. You only mentioned you failed to meet one of the key criteria.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • I have found out that my reclaim would have been paid, if I had have used a credit card instead, can one of you please explain why?
    Also,
    Was there a difference between a Personal Loan and Dealership Car Finance back in 2003, again, can one of you explain the differences?

    Thanks

    Supersaver7
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,290 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I have found out that my reclaim would have been paid, if I had have used a credit card instead, can one of you please explain why?

    That is not the case. I suspect there is a misunderstanding or miscommunication here.

    The sale was in 2003. That makes it pre-regulation. This is why the car dealer doesnt have to consider the complaint. Car dealers only became regulated in Jan 2005 and are only required to consider complaints about sales made after that date. However, banks have to consider pre-regulation sales as they were a member of an earlier body. So, a credit card used pre-regulation and had PPI would have to have a complaint considered. It doesnt mean you would be paid out. Credit Card PPI complaints are about 50/50 on upheld/rejected. However, it does explain why the car dealer doesnt have to listen to your complaint.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • -taff
    -taff Posts: 15,585 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Your complaint may have been successful agasint the credit card if you had used one. Or if there had been a problem with your purchase you could have made a Section 75 request.
    Neither of those things happened, so your complaint is dead in the water..
    Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.