We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Retention Not Held Back (Leasehold)

2»

Comments

  • Thanks eddddy,

    The lease states:
    The Lessee shall pay to the Manager the Lessee's Proportion of the Maintenance Expenses in manner following that is to say:

    In advance on the First day of March and the First day of September in every year throughout the Term one half of the Lessee's Proportion of the amount estimated from time to time by the Manager or its managing agents as the Maintenance Expenses for the year the first payment to be apportioned (if necessary) from the date hereof

    The management agent has written to me advising that the balance will be automatically transferred to me, and if it is not paid within a set time I will be subject to penalty charges.

    So from what you are suggesting this is incorrect and I/my solicitor should challenge the agent on this.

    The year end accounts overspend, which is a separate issue, will be demanded of me, as the current owner, and I accept that the seller has no legal obligation to pay this (if not covered by a retention agreement). On this part will focus my efforts on understanding if an agreement existed between the solicitors and act accordingly.
  • mrschaucer
    mrschaucer Posts: 953 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    During conveyancing it is usual that the seller pays the management company to provide an official "seller's pack" to the buyer's solicitor - the buyer's solicitor will demand this as it has lots of relevant info about the management charges, sinking fund etc. One of the questions it covers is whether the seller is up to date with the service charge. This is one of the issues that determines the amount of the retention to be held.
    Did your solicitor get a seller's pack from the managing company, and what did it say re whether the seller was "up to date" on the service charge? If the seller was in arrears it should have been brought to your solicitor's attention BEFORE exchange, not "after completion" as you say in your OP.
    Just something else to check with your solicitor.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.