We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Buying Flat with Low Lease- Section 42

abbi_claire
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hi,
We have had an offer accepted on a property that has a lease length of 87 years. As part of the offer, it ha been agreed that the current vendor will begin the lease renewal process by issuing a Section 42 to the freeholder and then assign the benefit to ourselves to complete it.
We were under the impression that this was a common process however as we have reached our to instruct a solicitor who can act on our behalf for both the purchase process and extending the lease, we have received feedback from many a solicitor that this is not something they have ever dealt with and wouldnt want to take it on?
Can anyone advise whether this is common or not as it is making us doubt our offer if solicitors are not even willing to take it on!
We have had an offer accepted on a property that has a lease length of 87 years. As part of the offer, it ha been agreed that the current vendor will begin the lease renewal process by issuing a Section 42 to the freeholder and then assign the benefit to ourselves to complete it.
We were under the impression that this was a common process however as we have reached our to instruct a solicitor who can act on our behalf for both the purchase process and extending the lease, we have received feedback from many a solicitor that this is not something they have ever dealt with and wouldnt want to take it on?
Can anyone advise whether this is common or not as it is making us doubt our offer if solicitors are not even willing to take it on!
0
Comments
-
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Its very common and I am surprised you are having this trouble, I have done it myself.
[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]You do need to appoint a solicitor who will be able to check that the section 42 notice is valid, is to be served on the right person at the right address, you do not get a 2nd chance if anything is wrong. Also the assignment of the notice needs to be correct if you are to take over.
[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Have you or the vendor received RICS qualified advice as to the likely premium you will pay and the appropriate figure to put in the section 42?
[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The lease extension may go smoothly at the price you hope for or it may not, these are some of the ways a freeholder can frustrate the process. You will be responsible for the freeholders costs even if you pull out.
[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/lease-extension[/FONT]0 -
Thanks for this- my research online seems to suggest it is a common process so I am surprised at the reaction of the solicitors we contacted!
In terms of the suggested likely premium, we are currently going off a quote that the vendor got from the freeholder but we will be looking to instruct a surveyor to act on our behalf to confirm the appropriate figure for the Section 42.
Thank you for your help!0 -
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]The quote from the freeholder may or may not be for a statutory lease extension, ie +90 year at a peppercorn rent and on the same term.
[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]If the lease has a fixed ground rent you can get an idea of approx cost here:
[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]https://www.lease-advice.org/calculator/[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Being 87 year you will not have to pay marriage value which will help contain the cost.[/FONT]0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards