We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Shared drain "build over agreement" / indemnity

Hi all,

We are in the process of selling our house, constructed in 2006.

The house forms parts of a small estate of 4 houses and the sewers from these properties join uo and run under our driveway (block paved) and side entrance path before exiting the property and "estate" boundary to public sewer.

The buyers solicitor is demanding a copy of a build over agreement or, indemnity insurance in lieu of such agreement. I have had no knowledge this was required and my solicitor doesn't seem able to explain clearly to me why it's required either.

From my (limited) research, this seems to be a result of the 2011 change when water companies became responsible for any shared drain running under private property. However, the build over agreements and indemnity only seem relevant if there is actually a "construction" over the drain, not a path or driveway? There are three access points on our property.

Can anyone please advise if they think we need a build over agreement or if we need to pay for the indemnity out of the sale proceeds for the buyer as both solicitors are suggesting?

Many thanks!

Comments

  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Since 2010 there has had to be consultation with the water authority before building within 3m of a public sewer, as that's in the Building Regulations Part H4.

    What the regulations stated in 2006, I can't say, but at that time the relevance would have been to shared private drains, not public, as you suggest

    I would tell the other side's solicitors that the estate was built and signed off to the council's satisfaction in 2006 (or whenever) and that the modern building regs as regards drainage do not apply.

    If they still come back on this, it's very likely that some useless indemnity policy will be a lot cheaper than attempting to get retrospective permission from the water authority.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.