We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mis-represented freehold/leasehold

Adam_Thickett
Posts: 4 Newbie
Hi all,
Me and my gf are first time buyers. We made an offer and had it accepted by the seller on a freehold property that has a flat in what used to be its basement. This caused some problems with the mortgage but is now resolved. We are in the process of conveyance and waiting to hear about a mortgage approval and our solicitors have contacted us saying the sellers are only offering 50% of the freehold and even that is only transferred to us IF the flat is sold.
We feel we were misled by the estate agent and the seller as we were given the impression on all paperwork that we would receive 100% of the freehold with our purchase until the contract was given to our solicitors. Our solicitors have asked and the seller won't budge. We are already £700 out of pocket on searches and broker fees and are now considering pulling out as the whole situation is far more complicated than we wanted. Also I am concerned that we could get rejected for the mortgage as that was submitted in the basis of us owning the freehold and selling on would be a big problem for us when we want to move up the ladder.
Right now any advice would be appreciated as our solicitors are giving us the absolute minimum they can get away with.
Thanks
Adam.
Me and my gf are first time buyers. We made an offer and had it accepted by the seller on a freehold property that has a flat in what used to be its basement. This caused some problems with the mortgage but is now resolved. We are in the process of conveyance and waiting to hear about a mortgage approval and our solicitors have contacted us saying the sellers are only offering 50% of the freehold and even that is only transferred to us IF the flat is sold.
We feel we were misled by the estate agent and the seller as we were given the impression on all paperwork that we would receive 100% of the freehold with our purchase until the contract was given to our solicitors. Our solicitors have asked and the seller won't budge. We are already £700 out of pocket on searches and broker fees and are now considering pulling out as the whole situation is far more complicated than we wanted. Also I am concerned that we could get rejected for the mortgage as that was submitted in the basis of us owning the freehold and selling on would be a big problem for us when we want to move up the ladder.
Right now any advice would be appreciated as our solicitors are giving us the absolute minimum they can get away with.
Thanks
Adam.
0
Comments
-
Do you mean that you thought that you were buying the whole building including the flat but not the vendor is saying that you have to buy the flat seperately?0
-
As I understand it, you cannot ever hold 50% of a freehold.
It is possible to own 50% of a company which owns the freehold and another party to hold the other 50% (of the company)I am not a cat (But my friend is)0 -
There need to be some leases on the property. If they are splitting the title then it could be purchased with you owning the freehold and owning the lease to downstairs with them being sole leaseholders, or the freehold is shared between the two.
You can!!!8217;t just own the freehold and there not be some sort of !!!8216;complication!!!8217;, simply because there is a flat underneath. You both need the support and protection of the other property to maintain structural integrity.
I think you!!!8217;re possibly blowing this out of proportion. Selling would not be a problem and obtaining a mortgage is not a problem if there is a freehold company and you and downstairs both own a 50% share of that company and both also have leases. Probably 999 years. That set up exists in the hundreds of thousands without issue.
It might sound complicated to you as a FTB, but that is as about as nice a set up as one can expect when one lives above or below another person. Two properties, both responsible for the upkeep and maintenance of the building. As good as it gets, short of not having any upstairs or downstairs neighbours at all.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
No. We are trying to buy a house which has been renovated recently and a separate flat added. We were told we would own the freehold and the flat was being sold as leasehold in a separate transaction.0
-
We were explicitly told by the estate agent that the house was freehold and the flat was leasehold. I would not have made an offer on the house had I known that it was not being offered with 100% of the freehold. It was actually a fairly big selling point for me.0
-
We were also told there was not a management company in place for the property which I think is now not the case if I understand what you're suggesting correctly.0
-
There has been no mention of a management company. Who has told you there is?
Having said that, ifI would not have made an offer on the house had I known that it was not being offered with 100% of the freehold.
* walking away from your £700 costs, and the property, or
* biting the bullet and taking whatever is offered (though it still seems unclear pending sale of the flat), or
* trying to renegotiate the price
Sorry. those are the options.0 -
Use your feet. Walk!0
-
Freehold companies and managing companies are different things.
Why is it so good that your flat has all of the freehold? It doesn!!!8217;t make life any easier, you still have to get money out of the downstairs flat.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
Why do you think owning the entire freehold is desirable?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards