We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can I let someone input into the bills?
Comments
-
Norman_Castle wrote: »If you do this keep comprehensive proof of how you've funded the mortgage payment to defend future claims of ownership.
The claim of ownership is already there. The proportion of mortgage/bills payment doesn't make any difference. The % split of ownership has already been set with a tenants in common, joint tenants agreement or other % agreed via the solicitors during the purchase.
This is one issue not to sweep under the carpet and hope it's OK on the day of reckoning. A proper legal document needs to be drawn up asap.Signature on holiday for two weeks0 -
Mutton_Geoff wrote: »The claim of ownership is already there. The proportion of mortgage/bills payment doesn't make any difference. The % split of ownership has already been set with a tenants in common, joint tenants agreement or other % agreed via the solicitors during the purchase.
.
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Presumably that can be altered by a new deed of trust. If the ex receives deposit back now and is not contributing to any future mortgage payments then this could record a 0%/100% tenancy in common.
[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]Since then the ex would then have no beneficial interest in the property I think they also avoid the additional stamp duty if they buy elsewhere.[/FONT]0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards