We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Leasehold flat insurance question

Hi,

My wife and I are buying a flat and are in the very final stages. Turns out the building was underpinned in 1988 and the insurance company were unaware of this. They have had a survey done and it has come back fine, they want to know the original reason for the underpinning but nobody seems to know, The freeholder has changed since. The building is insured but with no subsidence cover. Our solicitor will not exchange until subsidence cover is in place but if the initial reason for underpinning cannot be found is there anything we can do?

Comments

  • You can't do very much but the seller should have made sure this was all sorted out when he bought, or if he lived there in 1988, when it happened.

    I would walk away, as you could have a lot of difficulties selling in the future. If there is no subsidence cover, then if you are having a mortgage the lender will not proceed with the loan, so the property would only have a cash buyer and therefore its value should be significantly discounted.
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
  • You could look here http://www.bureauinsure.co.uk/subsidence_insurance.htm to get insurance as they deal with just this problem. Could take a while to sort out though and the mortgage company won't proceed without proper buildings insurance. Did you try asking any of the other occupants of the flat? Surely their insurance cover is also affected
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.