We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Question about the NTK compliance (from sticky)
Comments
-
CPS vs AJH Films was about an employee/employer relationship. It has no bearing on your situation whatsoever. I would write back and threaten them with the SRA for giving out such misleading information.
It won't make it go away which you seem to be hoping for but it might dissuade them from launching a court claim.0 -
Indeed, I woudl ask them how this case - which was not attended so never defended properly - has ANY bearing?
It deals with the well trodden ground of Agency, and for them to state that Agency has any bearing here is laughable but more importantly is misleading to an unrepresented consumer
You require them to confirm they wish to yet again use this discredited theory of theirs, and you will have nmore grounds on which to complain to the SRA about their breach of professional ethics.
OF course they can withdraw this suggestion and your complaint will be a little shorter0 -
What did you find out from all the other threads about that case, when you searched? You will get so much more, just by searching.Combined Parking Solutions Ltd v AJH Films LtdPRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Post removed to avoid confusion0
-
I have a similar question. I have appealed an NTK on the basis of late issue but they have responded with "the charge only has to be issued within 14 days if the operator wishes to rely on POFA. As you can see, there is no reference to POFA in the NTK, therefore the NTK is correct".
However, they are IPC accredited and the Code of Practice refers to compliance with POFA (though interestingly I cannot find reference to timescales for issuing the NTK in the Code). Surely they should therefore be complying with POFA?
I'm not sure how to respond now.
You should read the sticky thread for NEWBIES then start your own thread. Your questions will not be answered here as they will be exclusively for the original poster to avoid any confusion.
Once you have read the NEWBIES and started your own thread, where you will get all the help you need, please come back and delete your post above from this thread.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.
All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks0 -
Thank you - I did read the Newbies thread but couldn't see an answer to my query. I'll start a new thread.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards