📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Understanding a CETV

2»

Comments

  • Brynsam
    Brynsam Posts: 3,643 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    PhilNHove wrote: »
    Wow - two very powerful answers. Suppose I'll have to guess the multiple!

    The multiple is quite simply irrelevant. If you decide to transfer out, what matters is how your fund performs once you've done so - the risk will be all yours....
  • sandsy wrote: »
    Nothing has disappeared. If there is no spousal pension on death before the pension commences, then that's just the way the pension scheme was set up and the amounts paid in by the employer reflect the expected cost of the actual benefits that will be payable.

    FS salary schemes vary enormously in what they offer. It's good that you've found out and been able to make alternative life assurance arrangements. However, if that's your main reason for considering a transfer - ie. the risk of dying before the pension comes into payment - it's unlikely to be an overriding factor in any transfer advice you receive, unless you have a life limiting illness.

    I accept that it might not be the overriding factor but it is a factor when the CETV was c850k....
    Brynsam wrote: »
    Don't be afraid to go back to the people running the scheme and ask them to confirm again if you aren't absolutely certain

    We did confirm that is the case and so we took out life cover for a period to cover the time till SRA.
  • This is a sainsburys pension 50 percent paid to partner in death it also comes with lump sum of 45 k ?:) does this look good for a transfer or should be leave it alone , I have 2 other pensions as well by the way I’m 51 years of age

    Many thanks for any help
  • AlanP_2
    AlanP_2 Posts: 3,521 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    This is a sainsburys pension 50 percent paid to partner in death it also comes with lump sum of 45 k ?:) does this look good for a transfer or should be leave it alone , I have 2 other pensions as well by the way I’m 51 years of age

    Many thanks for any help

    So you would get a Tax Free Lump Sum of £45k and an annual pension of £9250, at whatever the scheme retirement age is, for life with 50% going to your spouse if they survive you?

    That's probably 60 or 65 and I assume the pension has some kind of CPI / RPI inflation linking?

    Or, you can take a lump sum now of £141k, and invest it so that you have a pot that generates income for you, income that you may need to last 40-50 years.

    I know what I would be sticking with.

    I agree the CETV seems low compared to numbers you see quoted sometimes but so what?

    If you didn't need the £9250 a year, because your other pensions are going to give you £50k a year say, but would like to have a larger cash pot that could be passed on as an inheritance then go for it, but again the multiplier is irrelevant.

    What are your needs and how best can you achieve them?
  • Prism
    Prism Posts: 3,848 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mgdavid wrote: »
    I'll pick up on 'presumably' and 'should'.
    If somebody cold-called with that sort of offer I'd say it was a scam.

    Not that anyone should listen to a cold caller but you really think that a 6% return per year is in scam territory. I think thats entirely within reason. Its only 3-4% after inflation assuming current rates.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Hi,
    new to this forum,quiick question,ive just had a cetv value for an old final salary pension i had from 1988 to 1999,the total transfer is 141k or £9250 per year,does look right as i think the cetv is a bit low ?

    If the fund is in deficit at the current time. Then you cannot receive more than an equitable share. The pension is a guaranteed benefit that the trustees and the Company will be looking to fulfill. Perhaps by the Company making additional annual lump sum contributions to eradicate the fund deficit.
  • Brynsam
    Brynsam Posts: 3,643 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    If the fund is in deficit at the current time. Then you cannot receive more than an equitable share. The pension is a guaranteed benefit that the trustees and the Company will be looking to fulfill. Perhaps by the Company making additional annual lump sum contributions to eradicate the fund deficit.

    Just because a fund is in deficit (and currently very many are) doesn't mean the trustees can automatically choose to pay reduced transfer values. See https://www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/en/document-library/regulatory-guidance/transfer-values and read from point 34 on.
  • Care this is a new post on an old thread with different users, JamesBond1 you should really start your own thread.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.