We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How do the authorities check if someone is a first time buyer?
Comments
-
theartfullodger wrote: »They monitor forums and get real names of users then work from there. Simple really.
Mr and Mrs Snake have nothing to hide.0 -
Thanks for the responses.
Did he tell the HMRC about his latest sale which was a 2nd property? He wasn't going to, but had no choice as the conveyancing solicitor had to complete forms telling HMRC. However, the purchase price he told the solicitor was £190k, despite only buying it for £90k, therefore cutting his gain from £160k to £60k. Apparently he spent a lot on improving it, which was news to me. I'm sure he's hoping HMRC don't ask for the receipts.0 -
Thanks for the responses.
Did he tell the HMRC about his latest sale which was a 2nd property? He wasn't going to, but had no choice as the conveyancing solicitor had to complete forms telling HMRC. However, the purchase price he told the solicitor was £190k, despite only buying it for £90k, therefore cutting his gain from £160k to £60k. Apparently he spent a lot on improving it, which was news to me. I'm sure he's hoping HMRC don't ask for the receipts.
I've bought two houses in the past. Both under the stamp duty threshold.
The solicitor still had to complete a form for HMRC. So HMRC will have a record of how much was paid, i.e. £90k. The purchase price may well be public information anyway, via land registration. Just Google the address and house price history.0 -
Leave him to it, let him learn.0
-
-
Anyone can find out who owns a house (as long as it's registered). Only costs about £3.
Anyone can find out what was paid for a house, going back about 10-20 years, I think?
But what you can't do, is search under someone's name, to see what houses they own. You have to search under the address.
Probably LR can do such a search. But it would probably throw up about a million hits under John Smith, etc.0 -
Some capital expenses can be offset against capital gains. e.g. if you spent £50,000 on a big extension then you would not have to pay capital gains on £50,000 worth of an increase in value over what you paid for the property.
That much is right and legitimate - the tax is on the the difference between what you have paid for and what you have sold for. If you paid £100k purchase plus £50k improvement then you have paid £150k for the property overall.
Your brother has taken a gamble that HMRC won't query the capital expenditure, by the sounds. He may be right. He may not.
My brother works in the department of HMRC that goes through records and reports of various sorts and decides who they need more info from - so I can tell you for certain that it's not a risk-free bet ...For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also ...0 -
Some capital expenses can be offset against capital gains. e.g. if you spent £50,000 on a big extension then you would not have to pay capital gains on £50,000 worth of an increase in value over what you paid for the property.
That much is right and legitimate - the tax is on the the difference between what you have paid for and what you have sold for. If you paid £100k purchase plus £50k improvement then you have paid £150k for the property overall.
Your brother has taken a gamble that HMRC won't query the capital expenditure, by the sounds. He may be right. He may not.
My brother works in the department of HMRC that goes through records and reports of various sorts and decides who they need more info from - so I can tell you for certain that it's not a risk-free bet ...
These days it's worth remembering about capital losses, rather than gains!
Spending £50k on a house, will probably raise its resale value by about £20k maximum.0 -
GreenSnake wrote: »Quite a lot of land ownership has never been registered with the land registry in this country anyway. Not sure if this includes dwellings? I seem to recall looking up a few houses in the past, only to find they'd never been registered.
Yes but since 2003 selling a property triggers compulsory first registration and it seems OP's brother has done exactly this: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/first-registrations/practice-guide-1-first-registrations#compulsory-applications-for-first-registration.0 -
GreenSnake wrote: »Probably LR can do such a search. But it would probably throw up about a million hits under John Smith, etc.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards